Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,859 Year: 4,116/9,624 Month: 987/974 Week: 314/286 Day: 35/40 Hour: 1/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Bible has no contradictions
ME2
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 221 (34390)
03-14-2003 4:16 PM


DON'T FORGET....REPLY TO SHAFINATOR'S POST #51
he/she has a point...if you can find time to answer mine you can answer his....
just apply your same wild, far out in left field mis-interpretations as you have been doing all along...
and also answer compmage...
i gotta hear this....
[This message has been edited by ME2, 03-14-2003]

ME2
Inactive Member


Message 76 of 221 (34397)
03-14-2003 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by nator
03-13-2003 7:56 AM


Re: me too! me too!
schrafinator
i know why he is avoiding you...
he can't...
i posed you same question on another board...b\c i thought it was a very good one...and one acknowledged it yet...
oh...but i did get condemed to hell for bringing it up

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by nator, posted 03-13-2003 7:56 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Brian, posted 03-14-2003 6:12 PM ME2 has replied

ME2
Inactive Member


Message 79 of 221 (34563)
03-17-2003 10:21 AM
Reply to: Message 77 by Brian
03-14-2003 6:12 PM


Re: me too! me too!
Brian Johnston
bruh..you're right...
agitated...is it showing that much
this thread has me scratching my head and looking dumb founded as to how a person can pull answers like these out of his rump and present them with convection and no proof to back the up with ...
conscriptor...you don't have to respond to me anymore.
there is more than enough posters that can pose question to you that you can't answer...
but it dose tell me alot about you....
you started this thread and started answering questions i might add in an arrogant mannor...
and when they got too hard for you...look at your actions...
1.you dodge and evaded.
2.you presented lame answers
3.you were hypocritical at times.
4.in terms of me...you've folded your arms,pouted,and is stamping your feet...and why...b\c i'm pointing out your flawed interpretations or b\c i won't follow a flawed docterine..
thats being a child...
anywhoo...once again..good point brian...
and conscriptor...i'll leave you to your own dellusions...
[This message has been edited by ME2, 03-17-2003]
[This message has been edited by ME2, 03-17-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Brian, posted 03-14-2003 6:12 PM Brian has not replied

ME2
Inactive Member


Message 80 of 221 (34564)
03-17-2003 10:27 AM


one last thought...
According to Roman time, the day ran from midnight to midnight. The Jewish 24 hour period in the evening at 6 p.m. and the morning of that day began at 6 a.m. Therefore, when Mark asserts that at the third hour Christ was crucified, this was about 9 a.m.
CAN YOU PROVE THIS...
never mind...b\c if you could you would have posted it to prove your assertion.

ME2
Inactive Member


Message 82 of 221 (34568)
03-17-2003 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by Conspirator
03-17-2003 10:35 AM


conspirator
sorry bruh...but i have and i used your own bible to prove it..
i proved by the bible's own words that there were more than one instance of creation...
i proved that they happened on different days...
and i also proved that there were different typs of creations...
what have you proved.....nothing....
except that you have a lack of comprehension,and nack for wild interpretations,and a vivid imagination....
thats what you have proven....
but why wate time responing to my un-important rants when you have posters that have posed some good and legit questions to you...
don't you me as an excuse for not responding to them...
thats called evading....you say you don't have time to answer them...but you find the time to respond to me...
thats called being hypocritical..
quit responding to me and answer their questions if you can...but which i doubt...
and your not doing my home work for me...
it's called...proving your point..
what you are is sloppy...
i see your type all the time on judge judy....
you come to court with claims and accusations and when asked to present proof...you say...i left it at home or i don't have it with me...
thats what your actions here equate to...
[This message has been edited by ME2, 03-17-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Conspirator, posted 03-17-2003 10:35 AM Conspirator has not replied

ME2
Inactive Member


Message 84 of 221 (34571)
03-17-2003 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by Conspirator
03-17-2003 10:35 AM


here ya go...
Main Entry: creature
Pronunciation: 'krE-ch&r
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French, from Late Latin creatura, from Latin creatus, past participle of creare
Date: 14th century
1 : something created either animate or inanimate: as a : a lower animal; especially : a farm animal
thats why i asked if you were a hog....and do you eat from a troff..
i only used the tools you used...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Conspirator, posted 03-17-2003 10:35 AM Conspirator has not replied

ME2
Inactive Member


Message 86 of 221 (34573)
03-17-2003 12:01 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Conspirator
03-17-2003 11:50 AM


Why not try studying Roman history and find out for yourself?
no you didn't say that...but imo...this is what this equates to...
let me see....
you have responded to me 3 x in a row...
and you have yet to respond to other with actual questions...
whats the problem...
i know...it's easy to respond to ranting instead of answering questions...b\c you don't have to think...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Conspirator, posted 03-17-2003 11:50 AM Conspirator has not replied

ME2
Inactive Member


Message 88 of 221 (34575)
03-17-2003 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by Conspirator
03-17-2003 11:58 AM


which mean what?
i looked it up and the first one is the populare one...
human is second...meaning...not as popular..
so tell me...are you a microscopic creatures in a drop of water?
instead of saying "i'm human" do you say "i'm a animal"
no you don't b\c there is a distinction

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Conspirator, posted 03-17-2003 11:58 AM Conspirator has not replied

ME2
Inactive Member


Message 90 of 221 (34577)
03-17-2003 12:12 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by Conspirator
03-17-2003 12:06 PM


actualy...
i'm messing with you...just to see how manttime you were going to respond to me after you said that you wasn't...
and now that i have gotten you to admitt to the obvious several times ...i'm done....
think about this the next time you start a thead...don't be a axxx in answering people and telling them where they don't belong..
and be somewhat prepared..
i'm done...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Conspirator, posted 03-17-2003 12:06 PM Conspirator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024