Re: Skeptics being wrong about the Bible. The Bible skeptics errancy list

Hello peeps.I don't think that Ken wants a list of Bible errors. I think Ken wants a list of alleged errors that skeptics held up against the inerrancy of the Bible but evidence discovered later meant that the skeptic had to eat their words.I am pretty sure this is what Ken is looking for, if it isn't Ken then let me know.AdminBrian.

Hi Ken,I must be in sleep mode today.I apologise if I have misunderstood your post, I thought I had read it correctly.Could you, or anyone else, clarify what it is you are looking for here?My take on it is this.You say: The purpose of this post is to create what I wish to call a 'Bible skeptics errancy list'. I interpret that to mean that you wish to compile a list consisting of errors that skeptics believe are in the Bible.But then you say I am not looking for instances where a skeptic thinks the Bible is in error. What exactly is it you are looking for Ken?More than likely I have read your post incorrectly but please humour me and explain in simpler terms what you are looking for.Best WishesAdminBrian.

Hi Eta,I do think that Ken has a point, this is not what Ken was looking to discuss on this thread, and therefore is off-topic.I myself wasn't sure exactly what Ken was looking to discuss, that is why I intervened earlier.Although I am quite happy to allow one or two off topic posts, (I myself am probably the most persistent offender in this regard) I would not like that thread to drift too far off-topic.I personally don't think that anyone who has really studied the Bible believes for a second that there are no errors in it, but that is not what the thread is about.Ken is specific in what he is looking for.Thanks for your help here Eta.AdminBrian.