"The Exodus Revealed" Video II

OK here is my claim: You have nothing in the way of credible evidence - nothing,zip,nada,zlich. There is a really simple way to prove me wrong and it goes:Evidence item: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXLab Performing tests: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTest performed: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXResult of test: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXnot an 20,000 word report - you can't even put one item into that - I repeat you have nothing and you are fooling no-one.

You're entitled to your fallacy, but incessantly repeating it won't render it any less so.

It's a fallacy to point out that you have presented us with no credible evidence that does not rely on circular reasoning?Is it not time someone accused me of being on a demonic crusade again?Come on - admit it, that simple form has you bamboozled - there is no way for you to complete it without exposing your case.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-11-2004 09:49 AM

See Charles, this's a good example of what I mean about you. This's typical of the way you operate, rarely contributing anything of substance to the discussion, all the while heckling and harassing those who are contributing with this bogus nonesense about them doing nothing. If creos operated like you do on science and other threads, we'd be run outa town or restricted to FFA by admin.

Well come on Buzz - show me where I have gone wrong, let's see that list of evidence:EVIDENCE ITEM 1: What is it? ??????.1)WHICH LAB CONDUCTED INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION? ??????2)WHEN WAS THIS CONDUCTED? ??????3)WHAT TESTS WERE PERFORMED? ?????4)WHAT WERE THE RESULTS OF 3? ??????5) WHERE IS THE DOCUMENTATION AROUND THE VERIFICATION PROCESS? AVAILABLE? ??????This is your chance to shut me up, to prove me wrong.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-11-2004 10:14 AM

But Buz, Charlie has done you such a favour. The more fuss he makes the more foolish you make him look when you just present the evidence and the back up for it.So far you've let him get further out on a limb. It is about time you cut it off and presented all the evidence that is there in the simple format that he is asking for.Then you can bake up a crow pie for Charlie. Fun huh?

Well, Ned, Buzz seems to be avoiding giving any evidence for the Exodus.Maybe you can help him out , and provide that evidence? I would love to see it.Or, Buzz can provide the evidence. It doesn't matter.But, if the evidence can not be provided, and all we get is insults to Charles, it doesn't look to good for either you or Buzz.

It's ok Ramoss - I've come to expect this sort of behaviour off Ned with his crackpot (and frankly downright strange) ideas based around something called "science" and "evidence".Can I eat a fact Ned? can I ? Can I put Jam on a theory?anyway - back to our show.....This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-11-2004 10:40 AMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-11-2004 10:43 AM

Oh quite. I have seen this behavior before. However, I would like to see the evidence to be presented, and I don't care which of the two people crowing about havnig you on the ropes present it. It would be fasinating to have some hard evidence rather than assertions.Wouldn't you be interested in seeing that one of these stories from the
Pentach actually have some historical evidence for??

Oh indeed - if they could present some evidence for those claims, it would mind-blowing stuff! We'd all have to sit-up and take notice.I just can't understand why we need lengthy reports and the like - surely a simple list of the evidence and where the tests have been conducted would be the ideal starting point.What do you think? Am I being unreasonable?

Boy, you're going to look like a fool after buz and his brethrens give out their straight foward answer(s) to your demands.

---

The Laminator
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

.er.That's it.

Chuck, Charlie, Charles, maboy, I've lost track of how many times you've blessed us all with this typical post begging for more lab stuff. What you've got is what you're getting until more is done. Lab isn't the only criteria for evidence. As I said, argue with the dictionary on that. You're useless humdrum to this thread, and most you participate in is like the constant drip from a worn out faucet.

---

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz

More? More ? I suppose you could consider ZERO as a expression of the lab work that we have seen.But I don't think asking for one piece is really considered MORE.....

Me, I have no problem looking like a fool. I am not perfect.On the other hand, it has been how many hundreds of posts, and for how many months, and they don't seem to be able to provide the evidence yet.Do you have the evidence?? I would accept the evidence from anybody.