Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did dinosaurs and man coexist?
David unfamous
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 60 (29354)
01-17-2003 7:42 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by iconoclast2440
01-17-2003 6:15 AM


My thoughts are that humans and dinosaurs in no way coexisted (both alive Peter).
My thoughts are from lack of any evidence that says they did coexist, and the overwhelming evidence that they were separated by millions of years. One year for every creationist explanation of dinosaurs most likely.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by iconoclast2440, posted 01-17-2003 6:15 AM iconoclast2440 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by peter borger, posted 01-17-2003 7:44 AM David unfamous has not replied

  
David unfamous
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 60 (33027)
02-24-2003 7:31 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by Admin
02-24-2003 12:17 AM


Re: ICR Paluxy River Paper
Why analyse an article that has been refuted by so many others? Here's one such response that should be read word by word:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy/retrack.html
"Morris' claim that the "human-like" depressions are "fairly consistent in length" is unfounded, since:
1. None of the depressions are very human-like,
2. The same depressions have been interpreted in vastly different ways by different creationist authors — some claiming they were "giant human prints" from 16 to 19 inches long, and others, such as Morris and Stan Taylor, indicating that the "best" prints in the trail represented normal sized feet about 10 inches long. Baugh and Patton recently attempted to show that the "new" human prints (in the same dinosaur tracks) are each 11.5 inches long. This they did by partially filling each track with muddy water until a puddle about 11.5 inches long was achieved!
[This message has been edited by David unfamous, 02-24-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Admin, posted 02-24-2003 12:17 AM Admin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by w_fortenberry, posted 02-27-2003 11:38 AM David unfamous has not replied

  
David unfamous
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 60 (33045)
02-24-2003 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Peter
02-24-2003 8:47 AM


Ah, you must be talking about the famous River Thames flipper tracks — flipper tracks right next to flip-flop tracks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Peter, posted 02-24-2003 8:47 AM Peter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Peter, posted 02-24-2003 5:40 PM David unfamous has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024