Wyatt's Ark of the Covenent

He was. He is now deceased. He is even crazier than Vendyl Jones.

YOu know, I don't care if you published books about Ron's discoveries. Without the corresponding evidence to back up those claims, those claims are worthless. A self published set of books by cultists is still just a bunch of gibberish.

Anybody who is willing to give Vendyl Jones the benefit of the doubt, or Ron Wyatt the benefit of the doubt, based on the evidence, is totally unrealistic.

Mind you, this is even Answers in Genesis that is laughing at Ron Wyatt.

What is funny is that the Ivory pomogranet has been shown to be a forgery. Funny how the Ron Wyatt supporters have not gotten the word
yet.Page Unavailable - ABC NewsThis message has been edited by ramoss, 05-04-2005 11:25 AM

That sounds like total b.s. to me.Do you have supporting documentation for that claim )

Oh.Then you will be able to present a peer reviewed article in an archelogical journal that Ron Wyatt wrote about his discoveries.

How convient. I find those excuses quite unbelievable. OF course, I find Ron Wyatt's claims unbelievable too, particularly since he does NOT have any kind of objective evidence of his claims.

The photographs that Ron used were modified to get rid of those elements he did not want. THe age of the pictographs were known. If Ron were competent or honest, he would have found that out, rather than make declarations about them that are nonsense.

Take two tablets and call me in the morning.

quote:

---

EZscience, if there was "no evidence whatsoever" then Ron's discoveries NEVER would have gotten onto CNN, Dateline, 20/20, PAX TV, The 700 Club, PBS, and in Time and Newsweek, and published by a Swedish scientist who's entire profession deals with "looking at the evidence"! BUT THEY HAVE!

---

A lot of things are mentioned on news that are just plain amusing.. such as a stain in an underpass that the faithful insist looks like the virgin mary (and looks like a gender specific piece of anatomy to me, but then again I have a dirty mind). ' That doesn't mean it is true.. just a good laugh.

quote:

---

For Jar or anyone to blatently say that Ron has "no evidence whatsoever for his claims" is a person who is playing games -- they are NOT dealing seriously with the material, and they are only doing this message forum a disservice because of their preconcieved biases against Ron Wyatt and his work!

---

Well, if there was evidence, people like you would have actually PRESENTED it, instead of making stupid statements, and unverified claims.I mean, where is the beef. You talk on how it goes aginst 'the entire concept of honest/serious scientific investigation', but when it comes to presenting the evidence, we get blurred photos, unsubstantiated wild claims, and childish accusations.Give objective evidence that can be investigated. I suspect I will get
claims, and avoidence of the issues yet again.

Oh, I am sure they weren't all "swamp gas". Some will be venus, some will be mars, some will be weather balloons, some even might be air planes, satallites.However, there is zero evidence that any of them are extraterestrial vechicals.After all, just because there is a object that is flying that is unidentified doesn't mean it is anything strange like that.

I would say that woudl be true of many people. I can name a few other 'archelogists' that are in that catagory today. Ron Wyatt is just the most deluded of them.

Conspiracty theories, huh? I don't take these wild and bizarre conspiracy theories seriously at all, particularly when it is combined with a strong lack of understanding of the Jewish religon, and a big deal of bigotry against the Muslims and the Jews at the same time.