quote:
Originally posted by Cravingjava:
You're inability to understand the bible almost ranks up there with your blatant hypocrisy by using the term "Good Lord..."
Though the letter thouroughly explains why one may choose to not accept the bible as God's Word...it clearly fails to prove anything in regards to the falsehood of the Bible. It is only an opinion and nothing more.
You ceretainly are a hostile person- that letter was not intended to falsify the Bible. Rather, it was intended to clarify the atheistic position... surely you knew this
quote:
inability to understand the bible
This would be saying that Lud is stupid, which is in no way true. Perhaps you should consider presenting evidence or responding to the letter, instead of blatantly insulting the level of intelligence of a person you are in no way acquainted with.
quote:
Though the letter thouroughly explains why one may choose to not accept the bible as God's Word...it clearly fails to prove anything in regards to the falsehood of the Bible. It is only an opinion and nothing more.
And the opinions expressed in the letter are similar to Lud's beliefs- and that's all Lud was asserting- you insulted him, for no apparent reason.
quote:
quote:
Originally posted by Cravingjava:
You're inability to understand the bible almost ranks up there with your blatant hypocrisy by using the term "Good Lord..."
I assume you're aware that LudvanB is a Christian- is he not entitled to the "good lord" if he does not believe in the literal bible? Or were you once again making an arrogant and unfounded presumption regarding the positions held by Lud, lacking any basis?
[This message has been edited by quicksink, 03-15-2002]