Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Biblical contradictions.
quicksink
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 329 (6896)
03-15-2002 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Cravingjava
03-15-2002 10:14 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Cravingjava:
You're inability to understand the bible almost ranks up there with your blatant hypocrisy by using the term "Good Lord..."
Though the letter thouroughly explains why one may choose to not accept the bible as God's Word...it clearly fails to prove anything in regards to the falsehood of the Bible. It is only an opinion and nothing more.

You ceretainly are a hostile person- that letter was not intended to falsify the Bible. Rather, it was intended to clarify the atheistic position... surely you knew this
quote:
inability to understand the bible
This would be saying that Lud is stupid, which is in no way true. Perhaps you should consider presenting evidence or responding to the letter, instead of blatantly insulting the level of intelligence of a person you are in no way acquainted with.
quote:
Though the letter thouroughly explains why one may choose to not accept the bible as God's Word...it clearly fails to prove anything in regards to the falsehood of the Bible. It is only an opinion and nothing more.
And the opinions expressed in the letter are similar to Lud's beliefs- and that's all Lud was asserting- you insulted him, for no apparent reason.
quote:
quote:
Originally posted by Cravingjava:
You're inability to understand the bible almost ranks up there with your blatant hypocrisy by using the term "Good Lord..."
I assume you're aware that LudvanB is a Christian- is he not entitled to the "good lord" if he does not believe in the literal bible? Or were you once again making an arrogant and unfounded presumption regarding the positions held by Lud, lacking any basis?
[This message has been edited by quicksink, 03-15-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Cravingjava, posted 03-15-2002 10:14 AM Cravingjava has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Punisher, posted 03-15-2002 2:22 PM quicksink has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024