|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,829 Year: 4,086/9,624 Month: 957/974 Week: 284/286 Day: 5/40 Hour: 1/4 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Biblical contradictions. | |||||||||||||||||||
w_fortenberry Member (Idle past 6134 days) Posts: 178 From: Birmingham, AL, USA Joined: |
quote: Though all judges have the right to be merciful, they also have the right to execute the Law to its full extent. In each of these passages, the ones being killed are those who have been found guilty under the Law. The ones doing the killing are carrying out the Law upon the order of the Judge. See Genesis 9:6. According to Matthew 12:5, those carrying out the Law are held blameless for any breaches of the Law necessary for is accomplishment.
quote: According to verses 20-22 of I Kings 22, God merely gave the lying spirit permission to persuade the king. He did not command the spirit to do this; He simply allowed that spirit to carry out its own designs. If you would like to research the ethics of this, allow me suggest a study of Romans 9:15-24.
quote: Here God will allow men to believe a lie because they have refused to believe the truth. In essence, He allows them to believe what they are already proclaiming as true.II Thessalonians 2:12 "That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." quote: In response to the first two in your second set of verses, let me simply say that you did not complete the quotation of the given passages. Doing so might eliminate these two from your list. If not, let me refer you to my argumentation concerning your first proposed contradiction. As for the final verse, you will notice first of all that the owners of the colt knew why and were present when it was being taken. You will also notice that Luke does not record their response to this action. Mark, on the other hand, records, "and they let them go." (Mark 11:6) Thus the colt was borrowed with consent of the owners. This hardly constitutes thievery on the part of the disciples.
quote: These verses can be best understood through a study of the following passages.Matthew 12:1-8, I Samuel 15:22, Hosea 6:6, Micah 6:6-8, Romans 8:1-4, and Romans 9 quote: Please take another look at the passages referred to here. If you do so, you will find that you substituted a period for a semicolon in your quote of Exodus 20:4 and failed to quote verse five. You also inserted periods into the middle of Leviticus 26:1 and Deuteronomy 27:15, failing to provide the conclusion of either verse. Let take Leviticus 26:1 as an example. If read in its entirety the verse states, "Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the LORD your God." Notice the phrase, "to bow down unto it:" You will find a similar phrase in each of the passages in question. Thus the Cherubims crafted for the tabernacle and the temple ornamentation designed by Solomon are not condemned by the Law, for they were not created to be worshipped. On the contrary, they were created to point men to God.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
w_fortenberry Member (Idle past 6134 days) Posts: 178 From: Birmingham, AL, USA Joined: |
quote: At the time of Christ, there were two timetables in use by the Jews. The Galileans measured each day from sunset to sunset while the Judeans measured from sunrise to sunrise. Therefore all the Galileans, including Jesus and His disciples, would have eaten their Passover meal on what would be by our reckoning Thursday night. The Judeans, on the other hand, would not have eaten their Passover meal until Friday evening. Thus Christ's crucifixion would have taken place after His own Passover meal but just prior to the meal of those who crucified Him. This explanation is supported by Mark 14:70. In that verse, Peter is told, "Surely thou art one of them: for thou art a Galilaean, and thy speech agreeth thereto." Why would they associate Peter with Christ merely because he was a Galilean? The Galileans had a custom in which they did not work during the day of the Passover. The Judeans, on the other hand, kept the custom of not doing any work after noon on the day of the Passover. Thus any Galilean mingling with a crowd of Judeans on Passover morning would be suspected of being associated with Christ.
quote: Jesus did not say that His followers would routinely perform these tricks. He said that these signs would follow them that believe. Notice also that, in each case, the reference is plural, thus leading one to the conclusion that though every believer may not perform these signs, the body of believers as a whole, including past believers, will be found to have had these signs follow them. This is certainly evidenced to be true throughout Scripture and the history of Biblical Christianity.
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
w_fortenberry Member (Idle past 6134 days) Posts: 178 From: Birmingham, AL, USA Joined: |
quote: The King James Version of the Bible is the primary English translation of the Textus Receptus, the Greek text which has been accepted by Christians since the New Testament era. Most of the other translations are from the Critical Text, a Greek text formulated by Westcott and Hort in 1881. Many arguments have been presented for acceptance of the Critical Text and its translations, however the final test for any book that claims to be holy is that which reveals the presence or absence of error within that book. In Mark 1:2, the TR, as translated in the KJV, states, "As it is written in the prophets, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee." This is a quote of Malachi 3:1, however the Critical Text changes this verse in Mark to state, "As it is written by the prophet Isaiah..." This certainly qualifies as error, and the Critical Text cannot truthfully claim to be the Word of God. As for why there are so many different translations, let me simply point out that, to my knowledge, the King James Version is the only current English translation of the Bible which can be reproduced royalty free.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
w_fortenberry Member (Idle past 6134 days) Posts: 178 From: Birmingham, AL, USA Joined: |
quote: The answer is found in Ezekiel 19:5-6. There we read,
quote: In speaking of Jehoiachin, this passage states that he was first made a young lion and later became a young lion. This would then lead one to interpret the supposed discrepancy between II Kings and II Chronicles as follows. Jehoiachin was made co-regent with his father at age eight. Ten years later his father died and he became the sole regent of Israel.
quote: First of all, I agree with you that the Word of God is without error or contradiction. This is the primary test of all Scripture. On the other hand, however, I would disagree with your claim that the KJV contains errors and contradictions. I have just recently completed a study of 279 pages worth of supposed errors, and in every case I found the Scriptures in question to be inerrant. Thus, using your same logic, I would have to conclude that, the true Word of God containing no error and the KJV likewise containing no error, the KJV is an accurate translation of the true Word of God.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024