Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,477 Year: 3,734/9,624 Month: 605/974 Week: 218/276 Day: 58/34 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   SIMPLE Astronomical Evidence Supports the Bible
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5930 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 96 of 197 (200539)
04-19-2005 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by ptolemy
04-19-2005 5:46 PM


Re: Consants are not evidence against the Bible
ptolemy
Which one is the TRUTH. The one that invents undetectable things or the one that can even predict how people think and that can accurately describe what we see in the sky. Think about it.
Perhaps you would care to make a prediction of an as yet unobserved phenomena of the sky that we can use to lend credibility to your statement here.
I remember having a discussion with a person here named buzsaw{consequently banned} in which he seemed to be under the impression that common sense is enough to answer the strange phenomena that appear when a good question is asked.Do you have a similar view? If so,perhaps you would like to answer a question I posed to him?
This message has been edited by sidelined, Tue, 2005-04-19 05:31 PM

And since you know you cannot see yourself,
so well as by reflection, I, your glass,
will modestly discover to yourself,
that of yourself which you yet know not of

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by ptolemy, posted 04-19-2005 5:46 PM ptolemy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by ptolemy, posted 04-20-2005 3:40 AM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5930 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 98 of 197 (200554)
04-19-2005 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by ptolemy
04-19-2005 5:46 PM


Re: Constants are not evidence against the Bible
ptolemy
Go with the simple evidence. Don’t try to force reality to fit our assumption.
Let us see if you can give the "real" answer to this scenario.
I am on board a train travelling at a constant velocity along the tracks as we pass a road crossing.I open my window and drop a steel ball from the train.To my eyes the path taken by the ball is a straight line{neglecting air resisitance}from my carriage to the ground below.
A man in the adjacent grass bordering the tracks views my misdeed and,being keen eyed, follows the path of the ball as it drops and witnesses it following a curved path {a parabola}.
This is a great puzzlement since we both witness the same event and yet we come to see 2 different paths,one straight and one curved.Since the event had the same origin and end point in each persons view we are left with the great puzzle of judging which path is the "real" one.
Can you explain this?

And since you know you cannot see yourself,
so well as by reflection, I, your glass,
will modestly discover to yourself,
that of yourself which you yet know not of

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by ptolemy, posted 04-19-2005 5:46 PM ptolemy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by ptolemy, posted 04-20-2005 8:17 PM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5930 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 105 of 197 (200656)
04-20-2005 8:14 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by ptolemy
04-20-2005 3:40 AM


Re: A prediction
ptolemy
I would like to see if this post could be attempted by yourself.
ptolemy
Go with the simple evidence. Don’t try to force reality to fit our assumption.
Let us see if you can give the "real" answer to this scenario.
I am on board a train travelling at a constant velocity along the tracks as we pass a road crossing.I open my window and drop a steel ball from the train.To my eyes the path taken by the ball is a straight line{neglecting air resisitance}from my carriage to the ground below.
A man in the adjacent grass bordering the tracks views my misdeed and,being keen eyed, follows the path of the ball as it drops and witnesses it following a curved path {a parabola}.
This is a great puzzlement since we both witness the same event and yet we come to see 2 different paths,one straight and one curved.Since the event had the same origin and end point in each persons view we are left with the great puzzle of judging which path is the "real" one.
Can you explain this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by ptolemy, posted 04-20-2005 3:40 AM ptolemy has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5930 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 112 of 197 (200824)
04-20-2005 11:29 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by ptolemy
04-20-2005 8:17 PM


Re: There is no real answer
ptolemy
Of course, as Galileo noticed four hundred years ago, there is no real answer.
Actually either answer is valid in the frame of reference of the individual.The difficulty presented here is the designation of just what is meant by the term space.Since an arc{parabola} covers a greater distance between the same two points than a straight line what do you suppose has changed to allow the two valid observations to equally describe the same event?
This message has been edited by sidelined, Wed, 2005-04-20 08:29 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by ptolemy, posted 04-20-2005 8:17 PM ptolemy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024