quote:
No, I asked why should men predisposed to reject Jesus, thinking it is a myth and yet decide to make the New Testament or Church history their life's work be more impartial than a believer.
Randman, who do you think is generally more likely to give a accurate and less biased description of the alien abduction phenomena; a person who believes they themselves has been abducted by aliens, or an investigative reporter?
If you already believe that you have been abducted by alens, you are NOT open to the idea that it might be all in your head. You are strongly biased and invested in the idea that alien abductions really do occur and that what happened to you was real.
Are you saying that an investigative reporter who is predisposed to think that the alien abduction phenomena is myth is going to be LESS impartial than someone who believes they have been abducted themselves?
Just what are you trying to have us swallow here?