The Existence of Jesus Christ

That's no debate at all...just "DENIAL".There should be no denial of Jesus' historic existance just as there should be none for George Washington, King James, Ghenghis Khan, Julius Caesar, Alexander the Great...Jesus, Moses, Noah, ...etc.ANYONE WHO CHOOSES TO DO SO DO IS LIVING IN A "FANTASY WORLD" OF AN "IMAGINARY REALITY". Kind of like the evolutionists.

Then you are winning his argument for him...because what you are doing in "SELECTIVE" ACCEPTANCE. You are "CHOOSING" to believe a Paul, or Peter wrote their letters but not Mark, Matthew..etc.Your thinking is not rational.

sounds to me as if you are doing a Nero on these guys, by "BANNING" posts that may have their faith in it...so does everyone else's posts. One can not avoid speaking one's "BELIEF" when stating issues that are "DEBATEABLE". Simply because you don't believe as some of these do should not make you ban their posts. What they are saying may be true.

Funny how you lash out at my post which has no name calling and say nothing about post 218. Hmmm.

I meant message 217.

Randman,You are absolutely correct with what you are saying. I observing from a neutral standpoint am noticing that these that you are debating with "seem" to have no interest in reality, but what they dogmatically have chosen to believe...or deny.