Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 88 (8927 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-23-2019 8:54 PM
24 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, jar, RAZD (4 members, 20 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jedothek
Post Volume:
Total: 860,347 Year: 15,383/19,786 Month: 2,106/3,058 Week: 480/404 Day: 84/63 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Was Adam Packin' Heat?
Eli
Member (Idle past 1722 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


(1)
Message 24 of 120 (678833)
11-10-2012 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by kofh2u
11-10-2012 5:24 PM


Re: Egyptians, hermaphrodites, similar but not the same
This is nonsense.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by kofh2u, posted 11-10-2012 5:24 PM kofh2u has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by kofh2u, posted 11-10-2012 10:21 PM Eli has responded

Eli
Member (Idle past 1722 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 28 of 120 (678863)
11-10-2012 10:38 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by kofh2u
11-10-2012 10:21 PM


Re: was Adam packin heat
Again you bring up subjects that you cannot even define.

Theistic evolution makes no claim or has no condition that necessitates Adam being the first species of man. The bible doesn't say anything about "Adamites" either.

It might be worth your while to learn that there are vastly more than 22 species of hominids.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by kofh2u, posted 11-10-2012 10:21 PM kofh2u has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by kofh2u, posted 11-11-2012 10:14 AM Eli has responded
 Message 35 by kofh2u, posted 11-12-2012 9:59 AM Eli has acknowledged this reply

Eli
Member (Idle past 1722 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 31 of 120 (678924)
11-11-2012 1:42 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by kofh2u
11-11-2012 10:14 AM


Re: was Adam packin heat
You have nothing to teach or offer.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by kofh2u, posted 11-11-2012 10:14 AM kofh2u has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by kofh2u, posted 11-12-2012 9:37 AM Eli has responded

Eli
Member (Idle past 1722 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


(1)
Message 44 of 120 (679204)
11-12-2012 10:02 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by kofh2u
11-12-2012 9:37 AM


Re: was Adam packin heat
You, sir, are no Wegener or Galileo.

They could actually evidence what they were claiming. It isn't a preconcieved notion that makes EVERYONE in the forum reject you. It is that you have no substance.

I change my mind all the time, depending on what the evidence tells me. Yesterday I did a complete 180 on my view of payday loans because of a factor that I had not considered previously.

The fact remains that you simply do not know what you are talking about. Different points of view are not equal and not all should be entertained, especially the conclusions drawn based on non-truths... you know, the stuff you keep presenting as evidence which turns out to be absolute horse-shit.

You have nothing to offer because you don't deal in facts. It isn't that I don't have an open mind. It's that I happen to know these subjects, so I can spot an idea that has no merit.

As long as you keep presenting things you made up and lie about what the science is, you will never ever have anything to offer. That's on you, not the reader.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by kofh2u, posted 11-12-2012 9:37 AM kofh2u has not yet responded

Eli
Member (Idle past 1722 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


(1)
Message 45 of 120 (679206)
11-12-2012 10:09 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by kofh2u
11-12-2012 2:43 PM


Re: was Adam packin heat
Perfect example.

None of the things you claim here are true.

NONE.

There aren't 22 links of humans right now.
There are not 7 geological eras.
All homo species except sapiens did not go extinct 40,000 years ago.
Y Chromosonal Adam lived 142,000 years ago, so you are about 100,000 years off.

All of these can be easily proven to be false. You are making shit up to try to reconcile the bible with science but you have failed to get even one scientific concept right. Everything you have claimed goes 100% in the wrong direction of what the science is. To top it all off, you are doing this to say that it supports the bible when the claims you make on the biblical side are 100% incorrect also.

You have nothing to offer because everything you have stated, to be nice in my summation, is strictly fan fiction.

Edited by Eli, : No reason given.

Edited by Eli, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by kofh2u, posted 11-12-2012 2:43 PM kofh2u has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019