Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9208 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,433 Year: 6,690/9,624 Month: 30/238 Week: 30/22 Day: 3/9 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Was Adam Packin' Heat?
mram10
Member (Idle past 3753 days)
Posts: 84
Joined: 08-07-2012


(1)
Message 46 of 120 (733338)
07-16-2014 12:04 PM


We should be focused on accuracy, as opposed to false claims.
The word tsela` as defined in the hebrew lexicon is the following:
side, rib, beam
rib (of man)
rib (of hill, ridge, etc)
side-chambers or cells (of temple structure)
rib, plank, board (of cedar or fir)
leaves (of door)
side (of ark)
We have to be careful to be accurate or we lose credibility as scientists

djufo
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 55
From: FL
Joined: 10-02-2014


Message 47 of 120 (737957)
10-02-2014 8:09 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Nuggin
03-01-2006 3:26 PM


Yes he did have.
Why God would not have Genitalia? I mean why do you have?
Even was not created at Adam's request. It was the Gods decision to give Adam a companion
Yes, God did create Adam in his image after his own likeness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Nuggin, posted 03-01-2006 3:26 PM Nuggin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2014 10:45 AM djufo has replied
 Message 49 by ringo, posted 10-03-2014 11:40 AM djufo has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 120 (737994)
10-03-2014 10:45 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by djufo
10-02-2014 8:09 PM


Why God would not have Genitalia?
Because he does not engage in sexual reproduction.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by djufo, posted 10-02-2014 8:09 PM djufo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by djufo, posted 10-04-2014 11:31 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 663 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 49 of 120 (737995)
10-03-2014 11:40 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by djufo
10-02-2014 8:09 PM


djufo writes:
Yes, God did create Adam in his image after his own likeness.
He created both Adam and Eve in His image:
quote:
Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by djufo, posted 10-02-2014 8:09 PM djufo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by djufo, posted 10-04-2014 11:32 AM ringo has replied

djufo
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 55
From: FL
Joined: 10-02-2014


Message 50 of 120 (738034)
10-04-2014 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by New Cat's Eye
10-03-2014 10:45 AM


Who told you God does not engage in sexual reproduction?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2014 10:45 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-04-2014 12:05 PM djufo has replied

djufo
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 55
From: FL
Joined: 10-02-2014


Message 51 of 120 (738035)
10-04-2014 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by ringo
10-03-2014 11:40 AM


It doesn't say there he created Adam and Eve in his image. It says he created both, but only him "Adam" in his image.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by ringo, posted 10-03-2014 11:40 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by ringo, posted 10-04-2014 11:41 AM djufo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 663 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 52 of 120 (738038)
10-04-2014 11:41 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by djufo
10-04-2014 11:32 AM


djufo writes:
It doesn't say there he created Adam and Eve in his image. It says he created both, but only him "Adam" in his image.
quote:
Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
In English, "created he him" and "created he them" both refer back to "man". That is, "male and female" refers to "man" so "man" must be mankind - and both were created in God's image.
If the Hebrew says something different, it's a mistranslation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by djufo, posted 10-04-2014 11:32 AM djufo has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 120 (738041)
10-04-2014 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by djufo
10-04-2014 11:31 AM


Who told you God does not engage in sexual reproduction?
Its a logical extension of monotheism.
Sex would require two gods.
Who told you God did engage in sexual reproduction?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by djufo, posted 10-04-2014 11:31 AM djufo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by djufo, posted 10-04-2014 3:12 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

djufo
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 55
From: FL
Joined: 10-02-2014


Message 54 of 120 (738055)
10-04-2014 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by New Cat's Eye
10-04-2014 12:05 PM


Monotheism is incorrect. It was invented by the Roman empire in the 5th century AD under the rule of constantine in his own convenience to gain absolute power.
Of course sex requires 2 Gods. How do you think our creator came to exist? he is the product of his father and his mother. Later receiving the great responsibility to supervise operations on planet Earth, and create us: Humans.
The ancient knowledge told me so. Since the moment the very first human civilization was born, the knowledge has been the same. By the way, if you heard is "mythology", which is the most possible scenario, all ancient civilizations on earth without awareness the others existed on other sites of the world, share the same knowledge. Because they were all raised by the same.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-04-2014 12:05 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-04-2014 11:49 PM djufo has not replied
 Message 56 by ringo, posted 10-05-2014 2:48 PM djufo has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 120 (738112)
10-04-2014 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by djufo
10-04-2014 3:12 PM


Monotheism is incorrect.
Where's your data?
It was invented by the Roman empire in the 5th century AD under the rule of constantine in his own convenience to gain absolute power.
I don't believe that was its invention, for he was introduced to it, no?
Constantine "picked" monotheism, rather than "inventing" it, wouldn't you agree?
Of course sex requires 2 Gods. How do you think our creator came to exist?
I wouldn't think that our creator "came to exist" because that would be inconsistant with "always existing". (I was raised Catholic)
But honestly, I haven't put much stock in the qualities of our creator.
he is the product of his father and his mother. Later receiving the great responsibility to supervise operations on planet Earth, and create us: Humans.
That's neat story, thanks. But if you're talking about a different God, than the one in the OT, then it really doesn't make sense to comment about whether or not Adam was Packin' Heat.
The topic kinda assumes a biblical perspective.
The ancient knowledge told me so.Since the moment the very first human civilization was born, the knowledge has been the same.
Wait... how do you know?
Like, that Sumerian stuff is real old, but how do you know that's the origin? How do you know that they didn't copy it too?
By the way, if you heard is "mythology", which is the most possible scenario, all ancient civilizations on earth without awareness the others existed on other sites of the world, share the same knowledge. Because they were all raised by the same.
That didn't make any sense to me.
ABE:
Dude, I've been reading your other messages and you're trollerific! Can you be serious?
Edited by Cat Sci, : See ABE:

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by djufo, posted 10-04-2014 3:12 PM djufo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 663 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 56 of 120 (738166)
10-05-2014 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by djufo
10-04-2014 3:12 PM


djufo writes:
Monotheism is incorrect.
Which part is incorrect? The "mono" or the "theism" or both?
djufo writes:
Of course sex requires 2 Gods. How do you think our creator came to exist?
If our creator "came to exist" he is not the original god; he's just an alien life-form. Who created his parents?
If God has genitals, you're stuck in infinite regression.
djufo writes:
The ancient knowledge told me so.
Old things tend to fall apart. I think that explains your "knowledge".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by djufo, posted 10-04-2014 3:12 PM djufo has not replied

djufo
Member (Idle past 3705 days)
Posts: 55
From: FL
Joined: 10-02-2014


Message 57 of 120 (738330)
10-08-2014 11:33 PM


You guys have to read a lot and a lot and a lot of more things to understand.... Of course what i say sounds insane and crazy but unfortunately all of you would discover the same. The logic is correct about the perception that God is eternal and if he has parents then who created his parents and so on. But remember, that is your perception of reality after being raised with a close mind. Inside a box. Trained and under doctrine beliefs. And on the other hand a troop of retards self proclaimed "experts" saying that we're monkeys.
In the eyes of an average mortal, a God is eternal, immortal. But they're not. They are born, they grow up, they age, they die. How old? well, in our standards, they live thousands and thousands of years. Do they have the technology for immortality? THAT specific information we don't know. We can assume yes, but only available for the pantheon or royal family that rules their kingdom. Unlike humans, the naturally evolved in their home planet. Not the kind of evolution retards here impose as the truth, but in millions and millions of years of progressive changes and mutations.
Why they live so long? Well, time does not exist as a universal constant. Time is just the perception of the existence, but it works at a molecular level determined by the exposure to electromagnetic fields. In our case, we were put in a planet TOO CLOSE to a star. I am not going to explain here how physics work, but you can study and research about the relationship between electromagnetic fields and time. So for us, anything that is beyond the reach of the electromagnetic field of the star sun, moves very slow, calm and peaceful. But if you go out of the solar system and look back to earth, you'll see it rotating faster and faster around the sun as you go further away.
Based on that is that it makes sense that the first generations of humans lived so long. 500-900 years. But as generations went by, the time span shortened significantly. We still perceive in our daily lives that time goes TOO FAST. Bu that is because we are not originally from here. We are hybrid beings created with earth DNA and alien DNA. We have discussed in other threads for example that all our supposed ancestors have 48 chromosomes while we have 46. So we lost genetic material while we "improved" and became better adapted and better skilled. Nature does not do that. An "expert" said on a different thread that yes, sometimes humans are born with 44 chromosomes. True, but that is a faulty copy. Not a better one. In our case the chromosome number 2 is fused. We didn't really "lost" genetic material, but somehow, magically, 2 chromosomes were fused to achieve a creature with 46. There is no logic or scientific explanation as to why nature did that, who was the first one, and why the rest kept replicating with the same phenomenon. Well, it never "just happened" those things don't "just happen" Ancient texts explain. We were created. A new needed hybrid species, bio adapted to this planet, gravity, oxygen levels, atmospheric pressure, etc, while looking like them and having similar skills to perform certain tasks.

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by NoNukes, posted 10-09-2014 4:51 AM djufo has not replied
 Message 60 by ringo, posted 10-10-2014 12:40 PM djufo has replied

NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 120 (738337)
10-09-2014 4:51 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by djufo
10-08-2014 11:33 PM


Are you able to read Sumerian?

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo Galilei
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by djufo, posted 10-08-2014 11:33 PM djufo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Tangle, posted 10-09-2014 8:20 AM NoNukes has not replied

Tangle
Member
Posts: 9580
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 6.6


Message 59 of 120 (738343)
10-09-2014 8:20 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by NoNukes
10-09-2014 4:51 AM


NoNukes writes:
Are you able to read Sumerian?
Given the above, it's more likely he reads Klingon.....

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by NoNukes, posted 10-09-2014 4:51 AM NoNukes has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 663 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 60 of 120 (738421)
10-10-2014 12:40 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by djufo
10-08-2014 11:33 PM


djufo writes:
You guys have to read a lot and a lot and a lot of more things to understand....
So tell us what to read. Give us the references. Otherwise, it looks like you're just making it up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by djufo, posted 10-08-2014 11:33 PM djufo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by djufo, posted 10-12-2014 2:09 PM ringo has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024