It seems if there is a copyright on the Behe rebuttal we can not allow distribution of it. We would also have to be rather careful about the extent to which it was quoted here.
However, how about this:
Is there anyone who would like to take up the ID side of this and use the Behe rebuttal as source material? They would have to have access to it in a legitimate fashion and then be prepared to paraphrase it a lot in support of their arguments.
Actually just using it as the source of the arguments would work.
I agree with Jar that, though I'd like to watch such a discussion, it is not fair to have the Behe supporters with part of their "amunition" taken from them.
It is completely moot if there is no one interested in taken up the Behe side though. Why don't we wait until someone puts a Suggestion up in "Questions and Suggestions"?