Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,808 Year: 3,065/9,624 Month: 910/1,588 Week: 93/223 Day: 4/17 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Musgrave, Reuland, and Cartwright critique Behe and Snokes (2004)
AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 8 (149263)
10-11-2004 10:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Nic Tamzek
10-11-2004 9:40 PM


One problem I see with this is that the full text of the Behe rebuttal is not available without subscription. That means all we have to go on is battling rebuttals.
Is it possible to get links to copies of the full text so that readers can make an informed decision?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Nic Tamzek, posted 10-11-2004 9:40 PM Nic Tamzek has not replied

  
AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 8 (149517)
10-12-2004 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Nic Tamzek
10-12-2004 9:07 PM


Given that the detailed information will not be directly available, is there enough here for a discussion or should this just be placed in Links and Information?
I really feel that without equal and unfettered access to the full text for both sides that no debate will really happen.
I'd like for a couple other moderators to take a look at this but as it stands I can't see how it could form a basis for informed debate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Nic Tamzek, posted 10-12-2004 9:07 PM Nic Tamzek has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by AdminNosy, posted 10-12-2004 9:56 PM AdminJar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024