velcero writes:
That is why I proposed the position that the sun being darkened was more probably caused by heavy cloud cover, whether it occurred locally or world-wide was not my main point.
And my point was that three cloudy days would be totally insignificant - no reason to mention it at all. It has to be a "cataclysmic" darkness or it has no meaning.
But it isn't an issue of inerrancy so much as literalism.
Could three days of darkness occur? Of course.
Did three days of darkness occur? There's no way of knowing.
Does it
matter if three days of darkness occured? No.
The importance of the darkness is metaphoric - it's a darkness in the soul of the author, not a literal darkness. The only errancy involved is taking everything too @#$%ing literally.
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC