Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,812 Year: 4,069/9,624 Month: 940/974 Week: 267/286 Day: 28/46 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Bible was NOT man made, it was Godly made
Taz
Member (Idle past 3318 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 7 of 320 (395328)
04-16-2007 12:40 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Juraikken
04-16-2007 12:11 AM


Re: Is there such a thing as "The Bible?"
Juraikken writes:
science does that everyday doesnt it?
Notice that this is the bible: accuracy and inerrancy section of the board. Please refrain from using this opportunity to make cheap and ignorant smears at science.
We now return to our regular broadcast.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Juraikken, posted 04-16-2007 12:11 AM Juraikken has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Juraikken, posted 04-16-2007 12:43 AM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3318 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 10 of 320 (395331)
04-16-2007 12:43 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Juraikken
04-16-2007 12:40 AM


Re: Is there such a thing as "The Bible?"
Juraikken writes:
which one would be considered wrong? compared to all the data that last one is unfortunately wrong and will be tossed aside, this has happened
Please refrain from making cheap and ignorant smears at science. Violating the 9th commandment would hardly support your case.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Juraikken, posted 04-16-2007 12:40 AM Juraikken has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Juraikken, posted 04-16-2007 12:46 AM Taz has replied
 Message 16 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-16-2007 1:01 AM Taz has not replied
 Message 105 by Garrett, posted 04-27-2007 3:28 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3318 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 14 of 320 (395336)
04-16-2007 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Juraikken
04-16-2007 12:46 AM


Re: Is there such a thing as "The Bible?"
Juraikken writes:
science doesnt do that?
Well, for me, bearing false witness includes telling half-truths. You've described a part of something while leaving out the rest and called it "the scientific method".
im not even putting down science, lol im using the scientific method here to discern truth from fact, you observe...etc
God help us if people actually believe you that what you are using is the real scientific method. But what does it matter, nowadays we have people who remembered 2 words from his high school biology text book and thinks he's a biologist.
For admins, sorry for the interruption. It just itched too much to not point out violation of the 9th commandment.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Juraikken, posted 04-16-2007 12:46 AM Juraikken has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by Refpunk, posted 08-18-2007 11:59 AM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3318 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 89 of 320 (396541)
04-20-2007 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by jar
04-20-2007 12:09 AM


Re: US Constitution and this thread.
jar writes:
Beside the fact that you got even that wrong, if anyone could be said to be the author of the US Constitution it is James Madison and not Thomas Jefferson, there are ways to determine who was involved in its creation.
I think he was thinking of the Declaration of Independence, which is a very common mistake by know-it-alls.
Start a new phase of your journey. Learning is a glorious experience.
This is what I really wanted to comment on.
I see learning is like taking your prescription medicine. Sure, it's good for you as long as you've taken all the necessary prescription. If you've only taken half and decided to stop, it could be more harmful for you than not having taken any.
Nowadays, the recurring theme I see is that people with a little amount of education tend to get too cocky and become know-it-alls. I've talked to many "bible experts" who don't even know the most talked about stories in the bible. They've learned something from their pastors and decided that they've learned enough to speak authoritively on the subject.
With that, I have an honest question for you, jar. If it isn't obvious, I'm beginning to doubt that perhaps education is not for everyone. Do you think that the so-called journey of learning you are speaking of will help people like Juraikken and not give him an even bigger false sense of security?

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by jar, posted 04-20-2007 12:09 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by jar, posted 04-20-2007 3:07 PM Taz has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024