Below are two lists of the lineage of Jesus from the New Testament
Lineage of Jesus | Lineage of Jesus
according to Matthew Chapter 1 | according to Luke Chapter 3
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Adam
Seth
Enosh
Cainan
Mahalalel
Jared
Enoch
Methuselah
Lamech
Noah
Shem
Arphaxad
Cainan ----- Who is Cainan?
Shelah
Eber
Peleg
Reu
Serug
Nahor
Terah
Abraham Abraham
Isaac Isaac
Jacob Jacob
Judah Judah
Perez Perez
Hezron Hezron
Ram Ram
Amminadab Amminadab
Nahshon Nahshon
Salom Salom
Boaz Boaz
Obed Obed
Jesse Jesse
King David King David
Soloman Nathan
Rehoboam Mattathah
Abijah Menan
Asa Melea
Jehoshaphat Elikim
Joram Jonan
Uzziah Joseph
Jotham Judah
Ahaz Simeon
Hezekiah Levi
Manasseh Matthat
Amon Jorim
Josiah Eliezer
Jeconiah Jose
Shealitiel Er
Zerubbabet Elmodam
Ahiud Cosam
Eliakim Addi
Azor Melchi
Zadok Neri
Achim Shealtiel
Eliud Zerubbabel
Eleazar Rhesa
Matthan Joannas
Jacob Judah
Joseph Joseph
Jesus Semei
Mattathrah
Maath
Naggai
Esli
Nahum
Amos
Mattathiah
Joseph
Janna
Melchi
Levi
Mattat
Heli
Joseph
Jesus
Matthew Chapter 1 and Luke chapter 3 both dictate the lineage of Jesus but they blatantly contradict each other. Before King David they are in agreement with each other, although Matthew only goes back as far as Abraham. Luke, on the other hand goes back to Adam. Luke 3:36 mentions Cainan in Jesus’ lineage. Who is Cainan? Genesis 10:24 omits Cainan saying Arphaxad begot Shelah and Shelah begot Eber. Genesis 11:12 also has an omission of Cainan in the lineage mentioned there.
But it is from King David to Jesus that Matthew and Luke disagree completely. Luke mentioned 43 generations from King David to Jesus. Matthew says there were only 28 generations in the same span but none of the names are the same between the two gospels. It is true people might have more than one name but none of the names match up except David, Jesus and Joseph. They don’t even agree on who Joseph’s father was. They also don’t agree what son of David Jesus descended from. Matthew says Jesus was descended from David’s son Soloman. Luke says Jesus was descended from David’s son Nathan.
Why would these two gospels disagree so? The disciples were no historians. They were just put into a situation where they were obligated to put their story into writing. I’m not sure why they didn’t research it, or at least talk it over. I think Matthew tried to exalt Jesus and show more reasons he should be King of the Jews. In Matthew 1:17 he says: All the generations from Abraham to David are 14 generations, from David to the captivity in Babylon are 14 generations, and from the captivity in Babylon until the Christ are 14 generations. Matthew and Luke both agree there were 14 generations from Abraham to King David. This information is in the Old Testament. Then I think he wrote the genealogy to make the other periods 14 generations each. The significance of numbers was highly regarded by people back then, especially in religion.
Another thing is that Matthew also made every descendant from David to the exile a King from the Old Testament. (Joram was a king of Israel; the rest were kings of Judah). The problem is the Old Testament doesn’t always say these Kings were a continuous line of descendants. Kings were often assassinated by someone that would then seize power. For example Matthew 1:7 says Rehoboam begot Abijah but 1Kings 14:1 says Amaziah was Abijah’s father. Another contradiction is when Matthew 1:8 says Joram begot Uzziah but Joran was a king of Israel and Uzziah was a king of Judah. The fact that the two were completely unrelated is documented many places in the Old Testament. 2 Chronicles 26:1 is just one example.
Matthew was trying to prove a point when he said Jesus was born to a line of Kings. At the time of Christ it was believed that Jesus was to literally be the next King of the Jews. In Matthew 21:2 Jesus is coming to Jerusalem and He tells his disciples where to get a donkey. As Matthew 21:4 says: This was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet saying: Behold your King is coming to you. Lowly and riding on a donkey. This is referring to Zechariah 9:9 but when you look it up Zechariah goes on to say this King’s dominion shall be from sea to sea (Mediterranean to Dead Sea?). And from the river (Nile or Euphrates?) to the ends of the earth You can see they are talking about a literal king to rule a vast region of land. This is what people believed back then. Only later did people realize that they maybe should consider Jesus as a spiritual king over the Kingdom of God.
Lastly I would like to ask — why did Matthew and Luke even mention the lineage of Jesus if He was supposedly born of a virgin birth? Joseph wasn’t even Jesus’ father. God is.
------------------
[This message has been edited by Dave901, 07-21-2003]
[This message has been edited by Dave901, 07-21-2003]
[This message has been edited by Dave901, 07-21-2003]
[This message has been edited by Dave901, 07-21-2003]
[This message has been edited by Dave901, 07-21-2003]
{Edited by Adminnemooseus, to restore page width to normal. I took out the pre-formating, for the discussion portion of the message. The original author had previously done 5 edits. I hope my edit is true to his intents.}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 07-21-2003]
[This message has been edited by Admin, 07-22-2003]
[This message has been edited by Admin, 07-22-2003]