Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Two Floods and a confusing type of god.
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 1 of 33 (43979)
06-24-2003 5:35 PM


What a formatting nightmare LOL
Anyway, so much of the forum is taken up with the scientific evidence and scientific plausibility of the Flood narrative, that I thought I would look at it from another angle, the textual angle.
The first thing to realise about the Flood narrative is that it is actually two different narratives, which are edited and spliced to give one seemingly coherent account.
In Who Wrote the Bible? by Richard Elliot Friedman, Jonathan Cape, London, 1988. The two different flood narratives have been highlighted in order for the reader to read the different accounts for themselves.
An interesting exercise is to copy and paste the passages that are in different type faces from the text below, paste them into different documents, and then read the two separate stories for yourself.
The J source, or Yawhist, is in regular type. The Priestly source is in capital letters and bold face.
GENESIS 6:
5 And Yahweh saw that the evil of humans was great in the earth, and all the inclination of the thoughts of their heart was only evil all the day.
6 And Yahweh regretted that he had made humans in the earth, and he was grieved to his heart.
7 And Yahweh said, "I shall wipe out the humans which I have created from the face of the earth, from human to beast to creeping thing to bird of the heavens, for I regret that I have made them."
8 But Noah found favor in Yahweh's eyes.
9 THESE ARE THE GENERATIONS OF NOAH: NOAH WAS A RIGHTEOUS MAN, PERFECT IN HIS GENERATIONS. NOAH WALKED WITH GOD.
10 AND NOAH SIRED THREE SONS: SHEM, HAM, AND JAPHETH.
11 AND THE EARTH WAS CORRUPTED BEFORE GOD, AND THE EARTH WAS FILLED WITH VIOLENCE.
12 AND GOD SAW THE EARTH, AND HERE IT WAS CORRUPTED, FOR ALL FLESH HAD CORRUPTED ITS WAY ON THE EARTH
13 AND GOD SAID TO NOAH, "THE END OF ALL FLESH HAS COME BEFORE ME, FOR THE EARTH IS FILLED WITH VIOLENCE BECAUSE OF THEM, AND HERE I AM GOING TO DESTROY THEM WITH THE EARTH.
14 MAKE YOURSELF AN ARK OF GOPHER WOOD, MAKE ROOMS WITH THE ARK, AND PITCH IT OUTSIDE AND INSIDE WITH PITCH.
15 AND THIS IS HOW YOU SHALL MAKE IT: THREE HUNDRED CUBITS THE LENGTH OF THE ARK, FIFTY CUBITS ITS WIDTH, AND THIRTY CUBITS ITS HEIGHT.
16 YOU SHALL MAKE A WINDOW FOR THE ARK, AND YOU SHALL FINISH IT TO A CUBIT FROM THE TOP, AND YOU SHALL MAKE AN ENTRANCE TO THE ARK IN ITS SIDE. YOU SHALL MAKE LOWER, SECOND, AND THIRD STORIES FOR IT.
17 AND HERE I AM BRINGING THE FLOOD, WATER OVER THE EARTH, TO DESTROY ALL FLESH IN WHICH IS THE BREATH OF LIFE FROM UNDER THE HEAVENS. EVERYTHING WHICH IS ON THE LAND WILL DIE.
18 AND I SHALL ESTABLISH MY COVENANT WITH YOU. AND YOU SHALL COME TO THE ARK, YOU AND YOUR SONS AND YOUR WIFE AND YOUR SONS' WIVES WITH YOU.
19 AND OF ALL THE LIVING, OF ALL FLESH, YOU SHALL BRING TWO TO THE ARK TO KEEP ALIVE WITH YOU, THEY SHALL BE MALE AND FEMALE.
20 OF THE BIRDS ACCORDING TO THEIR KIND, AND OF THE BEASTS ACCORDING TO THEIR KIND, AND OF ALL THE CREEPING THINGS OF THE EARTH ACCORDING TO THEIR KIND, TWO OF EACH WILL COME TO YOU TO KEEP ALIVE.
21 AND YOU, TAKE FOR YOURSELF OF ALL FOOD WHICH WILL BE EATEN AND GATHER IT TO YOU, AND IT WILL BE FOR YOU AND FOR THEM FOR FOOD."
22 AND NOAH DID ACCORDING TO ALL THAT GOD COMMANDED HIM--SO HE DID

GENESIS 7:
1 And Yahweh said to Noah, "Come, you and all your household, to the ark, for I have seen you as righteous before me in this generation.
2 Of all the clean beasts, take yourself seven pairs, man and his woman; and of the beasts which are not clean, two, man and his woman.
3 Also of the birds of the heavens seven pairs, male and female, to keep alive seed on the face of the earth.
4 For in seven more days I shall rain on the earth forty days and forty nights, and I shall wipe out all the substance that I have made from upon the face of the earth."
5 And Noah did according to all that Yahweh had commanded him.
6 AND NOAH WAS SIX HUNDRED YEARS OLD, AND THE FLOOD WAS ON THE EARTH.
7 And Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons' wives with him came to the ark from before the waters of the flood.
8 OF THE CLEAN BEASTS AND OF THE BEASTS WHICH WERE NOT CLEAN, AND OF THE BIRDS AND OF ALL THOSE WHICH CREEP UPON THE EARTH,
9 TWO OF EACH CAME TO NOAH TO THE ARK, MALE AND FEMALE, AS GOD HAD COMMANDED NOAH.

10 And seven days later the waters of the flood were on the earth.
11 IN THE SIX HUNDREDTH YEAR OF NOAH'S LIFE, IN THE SECOND MONTH, IN THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF THE MONTH, ON THIS DAY ALL THE FOUNTAINS OF THE GREAT DEEP WERE BROKEN UP, AND THE WINDOWS OF THE HEAVENS WERE OPENED.
12 And there was rain on the earth, forty days and forty nights.
13 IN THIS VERY DAY, NOAH AND SHEM, HAM, AND JAPHETH, THE SONS OF NOAH, AND NOAH'S WIFE AND HIS SONS' THREE WIVES WITH THEM CAME TO THE ARK,
14 THEY AND ALL THE LIVING THINGS ACCORDING TO THEIR KIND, AND ALL THE BEASTS ACCORDING TO THEIR KIND, AND ALL THE CREEPING THINGS THAT CREEP ON THE EARTH ACCORDING TO THEIR KIND, AND ALL THE BIRDS ACCORDING TO THEIR KIND, AND EVERY WINGED BLED.
15 AND THEY CAME TO NOAH TO THE ARK, TWO OF EACH, OF ALL FLESH IN WHICH IS THE BREATH OF LIFE.
16 AND THOSE WHICH CAME WERE MALE AND FEMALE, SOME OF ALL FLESH CAME, AS GOD HAD COMMANDED HIM.
And Yahweh closed it for him.
17 And the flood was on the earth for forty days and forty nights, and the waters multiplied and raised the ark, and it was lifted from the earth.
18 And the waters grew strong and multiplied greatly on the earth, and the ark went on the surface of the waters.
19 And the waters grew very very strong on the earth, and they covered all the high mountains that are under all the heavens. 20 Fifteen cubits above, the waters grew stronger, and they covered the mountains.
21 AND ALL FLESH, THOSE THAT CREEP ON THE EARTH, THE BIRDS, THE BEASTS, AND THE WILD ANIMALS, AND ALL THE SWARMING THINGS THAT SWARM ON THE EARTH, AND ALL THE HUMANS EXPIRED.
22 Everything that had the breathing spirit of life in its nostrils, everything that was on the dry ground, died.
23 And he wiped out all the substance that was on the face of the earth, from human to beast, to creeping thing, and to bird of the heavens, and they were wiped out from the earth, and only Noah and those who were with him in the ark were left.
24 AND THE WATERS GREW STRONG ON THE EARTH A HUNDRED FIFTY DAYS.
GENESIS 8:
1 AND GOD REMEMBERED NOAH AND ALL THE LIVING, AND ALL THE BEASTS THAT WERE WITH HIM IN THE ARK, AND GOD PASSED A WIND OVER THE EARTH, AND THE WATERS WERE DECREASED.
2 AND THE FOUNTAINS OF THE DEEP AND THE WINDOWS OF THE HEAVENS WERE SHUT,
and the rain was restrained from the heavens. 3 And the waters receded from the earth continually, AND THE
WATERS WERE ABATED AT THE END OF A HUNDRED FIFTY DAYS.
4 AND THE ARK RESTED, IN THE SEVENTH MONTH, IN THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF THE MONTH, ON THE MOUNTAINS OF ARARAT.
5 AND THE WATERS CONTINUED RECEDING UNTIL THE TENTH MONTH; IN THE TENTH MONTH, ON THE FIRST OF THE MONTH, THE TOPS OF THE MOUNTAINS APPEARED.

6 And it was at the end of forty days, and Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made.
7 AND HE SENT OUT A RAVEN, AND IT WENT BACK AND FORTH UNTIL THE WATERS DRIED UP FROM THE EARTH.
8 And he sent out a dove from him to see whether the waters had eased from the face of the earth.
9 And the dove did not find a resting place for its foot, and it returned to him to the ark, for waters were on the face of the earth, and he put out his hand and took it and brought it to him to the ark.
10 And he waited seven more days, and he again sent out a dove from the ark.
11 And the dove came to him at evening time, and here was an olive leaf torn off in its mouth, and Noah knew that the waters had eased from the earth.
12 And he waited seven more days, and he sent out a dove, and it did not return to him ever again.
13 AND IT WAS IN THE SIX HUNDRED AND FIRST YEAR, IN THE FIRST MONTH, ON THE FIRST OF THE MONTH, THE WATERS DRIED
FROM THE EARTH.
And Noah turned back the covering of the ark and looked, and here the face of the earth had dried.
14 AND IN THE SECOND MONTH, ON THE TWENTY-SEVENTH DAY OF THE MONTH, THE EARTH DRIED UP. 15 AND GOD SPOKE To NOAH, SAYING,
16 "GO OUT FROM THE ARK, YOU AND YOUR WIFE AND YOUR SONS' WIVES WITH YOU.
17 ALL THE LIVING THINGS THAT ARE WITH YOU, OF ALL FLESH, OF THE BIRDS, AND OF THE BEASTS, AND OF ALL THE CREEPING THINGS THAT CREEP ON THE EARTH, THAT GO OUT WITH YOU,SHALL SWARM IN THE EARTH AND BE FRUITFUL AND MULTIPLY IN THE EARTH."
18 AND NOAH AND HIS SONS AND HIS WIFE AND HIS SONS' WIVES WENT OUT.
19 ALL THE LIVING THINGS, ALL THE CREEPING THINGS AND ALL THE BIRDS, ALL THAT CREEP ON THE EARTH, BY THEIR FAMILIES, THEY WENT OUT OF THE ARK.

20 And Noah built an altar to Yahweh, and he took some of each of the clean beasts and of each of the clean birds, and he offered sacrifices on the altar.
21 And Yahweh smelled the pleasant smell, and Yahweh said to his heart, "I shall not again curse the ground on man's account, for the inclination of the human heart is evil from their youth, and I shall not again strike all the living as I have done.
22 All the rest of the days of the earth, seed and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease."
Some immediate problems appear for me.
Firstly, the Flood narrative, as we have it, is the work of more than one author, this brings into question Mosaic authorsip of the Torah. (as we have it)
Secondly, There are some differences between the two texts:
1. The Priestly source has only one pair of animals saved, the J has seven pairs of clean animals and one pair of unclean.
2. P has the flood lasting for a year, J has it lasting for forty days and nights.
3. P has Noah sending out a reaven, J has Noah sending out a dove.
4. P is concerned with dates, ages and measurements, J has no such concerns.
However, my main problem with the text is that it has 'God' displaying some ungodlike qualities.
For example, how can an omniscient God ever regret doing something?
Also, it gives God some human characteristics. God is grieved to his heart and he also smells Noah's sacrifices.
This is a very confusing type of God that is worshipped by Bible believers. Is this a God who has suspended his omniscience for a period of time, is this also a God that gets pleasure from the killing and sacrifice of animals, and surely if this God had any sense at all, he wouldnt need a flood in order to wipe everything out, he could do it with a single thought.
Finally, this 'god' makes such a mess of creating his playthings that he decides that he has to start again, but he keeps 8 of his faulty creations alive complete with original sin! What does this 'god' expect to happen, he still has a handful of faulty creations around the place reproducing more faulty creations, does he think that things are going to be different?
The whole incident smacks of human invention, complete with the limited intelligence of the humans that composed it.
So the flood believers do not only have to contend with science making a mockery of a literal interpretation of the Flood, they also have to decide which flood narrative is accurate and then deal with the most incompetent god that has ever been invented.
I am sure that there will be more problems with the texts, if anyone would like to post their observatons I would appreciate it.
Best Wishes.
Brian.
------------------
Remembering events that never happened is a dangerous thing!

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by mike the wiz, posted 06-24-2003 9:50 PM Brian has replied
 Message 3 by ConsequentAtheist, posted 06-24-2003 10:57 PM Brian has not replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 2 of 33 (44000)
06-24-2003 9:50 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Brian
06-24-2003 5:35 PM


'This is a very confusing type of God that is worshipped by Bible believers. Is this a God who has suspended his omniscience for a period of time, is this also a God that gets pleasure from the killing and sacrifice of animals, and surely if this God had any sense at all, he wouldnt need a flood in order to wipe everything out, he could do it with a single thought.'
Firstly Brian do you interprate correctly what sacrifice is for?
Brian why is it you go to so much trouble to attack my God , do you think i spend my days scrutinising my father's words - no , is he not able to think for himself,what are you trying to achieve with this topic because if your trying to just ditch all this on my God who you will never be able or worthy of judging then why are you doing it.
For someone who so clearly does not believe in God 's word why are you so desperate to abase it? believers are far more brainy than you think , these arguements mean nothing to us they are just an attack on God who we deeply believe in.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Brian, posted 06-24-2003 5:35 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by nator, posted 06-24-2003 11:00 PM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 5 by Autocatalysis, posted 06-25-2003 12:51 AM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 6 by Brian, posted 06-25-2003 7:27 AM mike the wiz has replied

  
ConsequentAtheist
Member (Idle past 6265 days)
Posts: 392
Joined: 05-28-2003


Message 3 of 33 (44029)
06-24-2003 10:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Brian
06-24-2003 5:35 PM


Brian Johnston
Firstly, the Flood narrative, as we have it, is the work of more than one author, this brings into question Mosaic authorsip of the Torah.
I doubt that anyone other than extreme fundamentalists and Orthodox Jews still entertain the myth of Mosaic authorship.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Brian, posted 06-24-2003 5:35 PM Brian has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 4 of 33 (44030)
06-24-2003 11:00 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by mike the wiz
06-24-2003 9:50 PM


quote:
Brian why is it you go to so much trouble to attack my God , do you think i spend my days scrutinising my father's words - no , is he not able to think for himself,what are you trying to achieve with this topic because if your trying to just ditch all this on my God who you will never be able or worthy of judging then why are you doing it.
For someone who so clearly does not believe in God 's word why are you so desperate to abase it? believers are far more brainy than you think , these arguements mean nothing to us they are just an attack on God who we deeply believe in.
Well, what people sometimes do in response to people like you (maybe not you, specifically) telling them that they should believe in the God of the Bible is to go and actually read the Bible to see what this God is like.
Did you ever think that people can be led away from the belief in God by reading the Bible and trying to make sense of it?
This is what happened to me, and I suspect to Brian as well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by mike the wiz, posted 06-24-2003 9:50 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Autocatalysis
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 33 (44054)
06-25-2003 12:51 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by mike the wiz
06-24-2003 9:50 PM


It seems a little paradoxical to me that you must have faith to understand the bible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by mike the wiz, posted 06-24-2003 9:50 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 6 of 33 (44108)
06-25-2003 7:27 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by mike the wiz
06-24-2003 9:50 PM


Hi Mike,
You seem to have totally misunderstood the aim of the post. It was not an attack on God at all.
This post was to illustrate that the Biblical account of the Flood is the product of the storyteller’s art. The first paragraph actually informs you that this was to be a look specifically at the text.
What the post proved by highlighting some basic logical errors is that these two stories, as we have them, cannot be God’s inerrant word, and that, contrary to tradition, the Torah was not written by one person.. There are far too many logical errors in these stories, which shows that the only thing at work in composing them was the fallible human mind.
What you do not seem to be willing, or able, to see is that these intertwined stories require us to ask ourselves a few questions. Now if these stories contradict the idea of an omniscient God, then either the stories are wrong and are simply stories, or there cannot be a God, God cannot have internal contradictions, hence an omniscient God cannot have regrets, because he knows everything and should have known what was going to happen. Having regrets usually means you wish you had avoided doing something, so how can a being that knows everything do something that he later wishes he hadn’t?
Why not suspend your belief in God for a few minutes Mike and try and answer these questions? What are you afraid of? Try reading some decent quality academic materials and then come to YOUR OWN conclusions, parroting arguments from creationist websites doesn’t win you any points Mike, to me all it suggests is that you are either busy, lazy, unwilling, or unable to study these problems for yourself. The ‘creationevidences’ website that you post as a source, is frankly an embarrassment, the arguments are pathetic, and the issues very poorly researched.
Here is a good exercise for you to do. Pick an argument from that website then pretend that you are opposed to it and then see how much evidence you can collect from various sources to refute that argument. Sometimes it is better to take up your opponents stance, it sometimes shows you the weaknesses in your own stance.
You see the thing is Mike, and please do not take this personally, you never really address an issue in any post, you just seem to brush these problems aside without the slightest sign of any critical thinking. I asked you for evidence of a six-day creation complete with evidence that every creature came into existence fully formed within those six-days, you didn’t address this at all, you simply tried to discredit evolution, I didn’t ask what was you imagine is wrong with evolution, I asked for something totally different.
Now if you are going to say ‘I have faith in God and your arguments mean nothing’, why on earth are you at a DISCUSSION board?
Anyway, you write:
Firstly Brian do you interprate correctly what sacrifice is for?
I am well aware of various interpretations of what sacrifice is for, however, the point of mentioning sacrifice was that the flood story gives God some human characteristics. A God that gets pleasure from smelling a pleasant odour, the mind boggles.
Brian why is it you go to so much trouble to attack my God
Eh? I am not attacking anything, I am critically analysing the material contained within the Bible.
My interest in the Bible is as a source for historically reconstructing the primary history of Israel, now the Bible to me is just a text, the same as any other ancient text, be it a letter from the El Amarna library or a tablet from Ebla, I treat them the same. The Bible is only one source that is used, the others being archaeology and anthropology. I really couldn’t care less about the supernatural aspects associated with the Bible, to me it is a piece of amazing literature, and to treat it as the fountain of all knowledge and reality is to show that you haven’t really studied it.
do you think i spend my days scrutinising my father's words - no , is he not able to think for himself,
I think that maybe it is about time that you did start to scrutinise the Bible, you will then see why it was actually written, you may discover its true purpose, and you might even realise that by searching for scientific and archaeological evidence to support the Bible then you are ignoring one of the Bible’s basic teachings.
what are you trying to achieve with this topic
A decent discussion on the problems of taking the Bible as a reliable source for reconstructing human history.
because if your trying to just ditch all this on my God who you will never be able or worthy of judging then why are you doing it.
Ditching all what? God is a man made literary character, if I was to judge anyone in regard to the Flood narrative, it would be the authors of these poorly constructed tales from their imaginations. But, as I said, I study the Hebrew Bible from an historical perspective, if you want to include a God in my research that I do not even recognise as a possible factor, and by definition historical research in my topic cannot include a God, then please yourself, but you are including something in my post which simply isn’t there.
For someone who so clearly does not believe in God 's word why are you so desperate to abase it?
I am not trying to discredit it, I am trying to sift through it for any material that can be supported form an historical perspective, I have a great respect for the Bible, what I do not have respect for is people who have a very superficial understand of it. (I am not saying that you are in this category)
believers are far more brainy than you think
Again this is your assertion, not mine. I know some very intelligent believers, the difference between some believers is their ability to present their faith as rational. I have many Christian friends who are teachers and lecturers, these people present very intelligent answers and argue their case brilliantly. Then you get the Hovinds, the Baughs, the Wyatts, The Morris’, and the Ham’s, who are little more than morons. It amazes me that a lot of people consider arguments by these people as being credible! I thnk you should raise the quality of your reading material, if you would like me to recommend a reading list for you then just ask, I would be pleased to post one.
these arguements mean nothing to us they are just an attack on God who we deeply believe in.
You have got a hold of the wrong end of the stick again. The post was a criticism of the literary construction of the flood narrative, nothing to do with God at all.
Finally, if all the arguments against God mean so little to you, why do you bother to address any of them, and you also get quite upset at times when your God is criticised by these ‘meaningless’ arguments.
Oh one final thing, if you think for a moment that I am under the impression that anything I post makes one iota of a difference to a born again, washed in the blood, saved by grace, happy clappy Bible believer, then you are grossly mistaken. This is not the reason I post here.
------------------
Remembering events that never happened is a dangerous thing!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by mike the wiz, posted 06-24-2003 9:50 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by mike the wiz, posted 06-25-2003 10:23 AM Brian has not replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 7 of 33 (44132)
06-25-2003 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Brian
06-25-2003 7:27 AM


hello Brian i must thankyou as you took a good effort to explain some things to me ,i guess its the jokes i just dont like , 'God's play things' and your favourite bible absurdity. i'm not suggesting you dont post topics it just seems like you who is always posting topics on the bible.thats fine its just you seem detemined to undermine it,i guess we can agree to disagree.
'Oh one final thing, if you think for a moment that I am under the impression that anything I post makes one iota of a difference to a born again, washed in the blood, saved by grace, happy clappy Bible believer, then you are grossly mistaken. This is not the reason I post here. '
you make me sound like a stereotypical unintelligent . lol
please dont think i am an extremist my topic 'none of the above' explains my position.
'Why not suspend your belief in God for a few minutes Mike and try and answer these questions'
i ask questions in my mind all the day long Brian,and i too have problems understanding the meaning to some of the bible,are you shocked?
you see its the jokes at God that upset me thats all.
thanks for the reply anyway.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Brian, posted 06-25-2003 7:27 AM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by IrishRockhound, posted 06-25-2003 10:27 AM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 11 by Peter, posted 07-17-2003 5:33 AM mike the wiz has not replied

  
IrishRockhound
Member (Idle past 4463 days)
Posts: 569
From: Ireland
Joined: 05-19-2003


Message 8 of 33 (44134)
06-25-2003 10:27 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by mike the wiz
06-25-2003 10:23 AM


It occurs to me, Mike, that if God is as all-forgiving as Christians like to think, then he won't mind jokes.
If I'm wrong and God does exist, I'd say he has a good sense of humour.
The Rock Hound

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by mike the wiz, posted 06-25-2003 10:23 AM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Newborn, posted 07-14-2003 2:57 PM IrishRockhound has not replied

  
Newborn
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 33 (45987)
07-14-2003 2:57 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by IrishRockhound
06-25-2003 10:27 AM


You are right ,he has a sense of humor.(Im Christian).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by IrishRockhound, posted 06-25-2003 10:27 AM IrishRockhound has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Brian, posted 07-14-2003 4:50 PM Newborn has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 10 of 33 (46001)
07-14-2003 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Newborn
07-14-2003 2:57 PM


Just as well, because there is a lot to laugh at (just jokin)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Newborn, posted 07-14-2003 2:57 PM Newborn has not replied

  
Peter
Member (Idle past 1506 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 11 of 33 (46321)
07-17-2003 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by mike the wiz
06-25-2003 10:23 AM


You may be mis-understanding the nature and intent of
this section of the forum.
Many of us here believe that there is a lot of sense
in the text of the Bible, and that the messages held within
it's pages still have some relevence today.
It is the 'literal' interpretation of the Bible to which
we object.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by mike the wiz, posted 06-25-2003 10:23 AM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Newborn, posted 08-13-2003 5:45 PM Peter has seen this message but not replied

  
Newborn
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 33 (50417)
08-13-2003 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Peter
07-17-2003 5:33 AM


reply
First of all,the animal pair that the bible talks in the two versions are the same and refer to the unclean ones.The author only made additional information.That is natural.
Second,is it forbidden to Noah to send two kinds of birds even if the author made a flashback between the verses?
And to my preferred error:
The fourty days and nights are the days in wich there were rain and the waters raise up.Of course the rain had to stop in order for the waters to decrease for the rest of the year.(Its evident that it takes more time to rise down than to rise up).
Ah,and God has human characteristics and note that God is CREATIVE and he has power to ressurrect people.It is no fun if he mades things in the same way.He do things in the way he likes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Peter, posted 07-17-2003 5:33 AM Peter has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by greyline, posted 08-14-2003 8:06 AM Newborn has not replied

  
greyline
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 33 (50516)
08-14-2003 8:06 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Newborn
08-13-2003 5:45 PM


Re: reply
Newborn, you didn't explain how an omniscient God can feel regret.
???
------------------
o--greyline--o

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Newborn, posted 08-13-2003 5:45 PM Newborn has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Pringlesguy7, posted 10-12-2003 3:57 AM greyline has not replied
 Message 19 by mendy, posted 11-01-2003 9:35 PM greyline has not replied

  
Pringlesguy7
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 33 (60595)
10-12-2003 3:57 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by greyline
08-14-2003 8:06 AM


Re: reply
Why does everyone put GOd in a little box, and try to give him human characterisitcs, and try to sum him up with human logic. IT CANT BE DONE, BECAUSE WE DO NOT THINK ON THE SAME TERMS AS GOD DOES.
NIV says he feels grieved, so thats a tough one.
------------------
"We may ignore, but we can nowhere evade, the presence of God."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by greyline, posted 08-14-2003 8:06 AM greyline has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by nator, posted 10-12-2003 8:38 AM Pringlesguy7 has not replied
 Message 16 by crashfrog, posted 10-12-2003 7:25 PM Pringlesguy7 has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 15 of 33 (60619)
10-12-2003 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Pringlesguy7
10-12-2003 3:57 AM


Re: reply
God also does evil, and we can't forget that he and the devil have a sort of pissing contest over poor Job.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Pringlesguy7, posted 10-12-2003 3:57 AM Pringlesguy7 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Prozacman, posted 10-20-2003 3:29 PM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024