Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,472 Year: 3,729/9,624 Month: 600/974 Week: 213/276 Day: 53/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Your favourite Bible absurdity
Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 11 of 159 (37224)
04-17-2003 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by sagg
04-17-2003 2:29 PM


sagg writes:
Why are you being so defensive?
There's a little reply icon at the bottom of each message that you can use when replying to a specific message. This makes it easy to tell who you're replying to.
All I stated was factual responses to your post. I didn't start off my post going, "OH Boy....", in an attempt to make you feel inferior - as if your ideas were pathetically inadequate. Yet, your first reply is a direct assault on my credibility - which you know nothing about. Why should I answer your questions if you can't extend the smallest amounts of common courtesty and respect towards a stranger?
EvC Forum moderators try to keep discussion focused by encouraging contributors to avoid personal comments, but while "Oh boy" is an exclamation with several possible meanings, none of them are denigrating to my knowledge. I'm not sure a denigrating personal comment would fit the context anyway. Are you perhaps thinking of the racist application of the term "boy", or perhaps the diminutive application of "boy" by which some adults might address a child?
I think Quetzal was trying to communicate a combination of surprise and dismay at your introduction of unexpected complicating considerations. "Oh my" would not be too bad a synonym.
------------------
--EvC Forum Administrator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by sagg, posted 04-17-2003 2:29 PM sagg has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 33 of 159 (37275)
04-18-2003 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by sagg
04-18-2003 10:16 AM


Hi Sagg,
Sagg writes:
I did not twist anything that is written. Again I ask you take this back. I quoted exactly what was written to show that the Word = Jesus. Please take back this statement, again, as it is an erroneous attempt to discredit my position.
You're going to have to develop a tougher skin. Rather than taking offense that Quetzal sees your interpretation as forced or tortured, take it as an opportunity to once more explain how clear and straightforward it is. In this administrator's view, you're asking Quetzal to take an obsequious approach to your posts.
[Correct egregious grammatical error. --Admin]
------------------
--EvC Forum Administrator
[This message has been edited by Admin, 04-18-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by sagg, posted 04-18-2003 10:16 AM sagg has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024