Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Whole Jesus Thing
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 43 of 286 (150312)
10-16-2004 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by mike the wiz
10-16-2004 3:16 PM


Re: The Whole Jesus Thing
quote:
The commandment "Do no murder" is aimed at humans, unless you think you can get a lion to read and write.
But if I managed to train a monkey to read? would it then gain a monkey-soul ? because surely you need a soul to sin?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by mike the wiz, posted 10-16-2004 3:16 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 57 of 286 (155363)
11-03-2004 4:48 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by EasyPriest
11-03-2004 2:39 AM


quote:
it makes sense in the context of the whole thing. Let me try to sum it all up...God made a universe with a set of rules - he had to create it in that way because of his nature as God. Humans broke the rules, so God created a loophole (Jesus) which allowed him to prevent us from being punished.
This makes even less sense -
a) God is bounded by the physical laws of the universe (and therefore can't be god)
b) God had to look for a loophole? I thought God could see the start,middle and end? Why does he not built this in from the start
c) Prevents us from being punished? remind me again - who created the punishment?
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 11-03-2004 04:50 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by EasyPriest, posted 11-03-2004 2:39 AM EasyPriest has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 58 of 286 (155364)
11-03-2004 4:49 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by EasyPriest
11-03-2004 2:39 AM


quote:
This assumes that God is bloodthirsty, which can't be shown.
Sure it can or do you think it's right to send bears to rip small children to pieces?
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 11-03-2004 04:51 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by EasyPriest, posted 11-03-2004 2:39 AM EasyPriest has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 62 of 286 (155481)
11-03-2004 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by cctman
11-03-2004 1:23 PM


First things first - Paragraphs are our friends!
quote:
actually I find that most of the people here that discuss understand very little about apologetics and the history of the church.
If I had a dollar for every christian who shows up and makes that claim, I would be a very rich man. This is the general way of things:
1) A member of the faithful shows up - makes this claim.
2) Member quickly finds out that this is not true - finds that member have a very very strong understanding of the bible.
3) Member retreats after his claims are shredded.
Let's see if you can do any better.
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 11-03-2004 01:30 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by cctman, posted 11-03-2004 1:23 PM cctman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by CK, posted 11-03-2004 1:33 PM CK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 63 of 286 (155483)
11-03-2004 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by CK
11-03-2004 1:29 PM


quote:
Heck we even murdered his own son and he still didn't disown us.
But the son was God wasn't he? And God knows all doesn't he, so he would know what would happen?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by CK, posted 11-03-2004 1:29 PM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by cctman, posted 11-03-2004 1:41 PM CK has replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 68 of 286 (155491)
11-03-2004 1:52 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by cctman
11-03-2004 1:41 PM


not at all it was a rhetorical question.
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 11-03-2004 01:58 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by cctman, posted 11-03-2004 1:41 PM cctman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by cctman, posted 11-03-2004 2:18 PM CK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024