EvC Forum: 51 scientific facts that disprove the Bible

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: 51 scientific facts that disprove the Bible

lyx2no

Member (Idle past 4743 days)

Posts: 1277

From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.

Joined: 02-28-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 58 of 167 (496788)
01-30-2009 4:03 PM

Reply to: Message 57 by ICANT
01-30-2009 3:05 PM

The Original 51

Hidden; with apologies to Modulous.

Sorry to run the above into the ground (yeah, right), but we really need to get the original list of 51 "facts" and the reasons they were later dismissed or we just end up counting dragon scales (to 18 significant digits, even).

Edited by lyx2no, : Mis-phrase.

Edited by lyx2no, : Spelin

Edited by lyx2no, : No reason given.

Edited by lyx2no, : Manners

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 57 by ICANT, posted 01-30-2009 3:05 PM		ICANT has not replied

lyx2no

Member (Idle past 4743 days)

Posts: 1277

From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.

Joined: 02-28-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 84 of 167 (498264)
02-09-2009 6:54 AM

Reply to: Message 65 by Peg
02-09-2009 2:37 AM

Way Ahead of You

Scientifically it is possible, its called cloning.

A clone is identical to the original. One can't clone a female from a male. And it would be very much easier to convert a female rib into a male.

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 65 by Peg, posted 02-09-2009 2:37 AM		Peg has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 86 by deerbreh, posted 02-09-2009 9:28 AM		lyx2no has not replied

lyx2no

Member (Idle past 4743 days)

Posts: 1277

From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.

Joined: 02-28-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 101 of 167 (498474)
02-10-2009 10:20 PM

Reply to: Message 100 by Buzsaw
02-10-2009 10:11 PM

Male?

With whom would God have sex that It be called a male?

Edited by lyx2no, : Logic

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 100 by Buzsaw, posted 02-10-2009 10:11 PM		Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 102 by anglagard, posted 02-11-2009 2:25 AM	lyx2no has not replied
	Message 106 by Buzsaw, posted 02-11-2009 8:22 AM	lyx2no has replied

lyx2no

Member (Idle past 4743 days)

Posts: 1277

From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.

Joined: 02-28-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 108 of 167 (498533)
02-11-2009 2:54 PM

Reply to: Message 106 by Buzsaw
02-11-2009 8:22 AM

Implants?

Are you saying God had breast augmentation so He could get physically in touch with His feminine side ?

For God to be meaningfully male He would need to be a sexual being. For that there would need to be other gods about or He was a self serving hermaphrodite ” not male, by the way.

What were you thinking when you asked about implants?

Edited by lyx2no, : No reason given.

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 106 by Buzsaw, posted 02-11-2009 8:22 AM		Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 109 by Buzsaw, posted 02-11-2009 7:47 PM		lyx2no has replied

lyx2no

Member (Idle past 4743 days)

Posts: 1277

From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.

Joined: 02-28-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 110 of 167 (498560)
02-11-2009 8:04 PM

Reply to: Message 109 by Buzsaw
02-11-2009 7:47 PM

Re: Implants?

The god who designed humans; who made Eve (female) from a part of Adam (male) effected a male child via his multipresent Holy Spirit. That's all we know. It is the Holy Spirit of God who moves about in the universe doing things and causing things to happen as per Genesis 1 and Psalms 104, etc. It was that spirit of God which did the creative work in Genesis 1 and that spirit of God which effected the virgin birth.

Which has what to do with God's gender? And who is "we"?

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 109 by Buzsaw, posted 02-11-2009 7:47 PM		Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 111 by Buzsaw, posted 02-11-2009 8:14 PM		lyx2no has replied

lyx2no

Member (Idle past 4743 days)

Posts: 1277

From: A vast, undifferentiated plane.

Joined: 02-28-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 113 of 167 (498570)
02-11-2009 9:03 PM

Reply to: Message 111 by Buzsaw
02-11-2009 8:14 PM

How could I Have Missed That?

You'd think I'd have noticed that having spent all those Sundays in Church and Wednesdays in Sunday School (Don't look at me, I didn't name it).

Do you think the question might have had a bit more depth to it?

Though the second question was just snarky.

AbE: On second thought, forget I asked. It's of topic.

Edited by lyx2no, : Typo and forget it.

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 111 by Buzsaw, posted 02-11-2009 8:14 PM		Buzsaw has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

4 online now:	AZPaul3, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), popoi, Taq
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,810 Year: 4,067/9,624 Month: 938/974 Week: 265/286 Day: 26/46 Hour: 1/2