Thus it is the debate between critical empirical scholars and traditionalists who have never trusted their own sources of beliefs
I'm not following you. "Thus it". What are you referring to by "it" and what is the "Thus"?
The quote you cites makes it clear that the fundamentalist suppressed bibical scholarship but I don't see then how it follows the debate is "between critical scholars and traditionalists who have never trusted ..."
The fundamentalist mentality generated a climate of inquisition that made honest scholarly judgments dangerous. Numerous biblical scholars were subjected to heresy trials and suffered the loss of academic posts. They learned it was safer to keep their critical judgments private...
Merle Hertzler on his web site pointed out that different Christians tend to hear the "Holy Spirit" or "God" affirming conflicting things based on what those individuals believe. So for example pacifist sects like the Mennonites tend to hear God denounce war while the more typical anti communist fundamentalist hear God approving of wars against the unbelievers. So it seems like the reports on the stands of the Holy Spirit are conflicted.
lfen