Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Jesus; the Torah, Nevi'im, and Psalms (Part 2)
ramoss
Member (Idle past 633 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 196 of 233 (273819)
12-29-2005 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 194 by Faith
12-29-2005 11:42 AM


Re: Prophecy fraud
And can you back up that claim? I am using the jewish scriptures themselves, in context.
So, the Jewish scriptures are now discredited as a source, except when you want to use them? Sounds disingenious to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by Faith, posted 12-29-2005 11:42 AM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 197 of 233 (273820)
12-29-2005 11:49 AM
Reply to: Message 195 by ramoss
12-29-2005 11:42 AM


Re: Messiah Texts
No, it is not. It would be evidence that some of the concepts about the Messiah were taken from a common source.
That's interesting. So you think some medieval rabbis might have shared a source with the New Testament commentators? That would be even more evidence for the NT's interpretations of prophecy.
It would not validate or invalidate the New Testament at all.
It certainly would be strong evidence in favor of the NT, since after all the whole objection you have of the NT interpretations is that they misread the OT and contradict Judaism. So if some rabbis at any time or place agree with them at all, your objection is undermined.
It would not validate or invalidate the Rabbi's concepts at all. It would just say that on some issues, the idea is the same.
Well, gee, ramoss, take the next logical step here. If the idea is the same, that has important implications for the objection to NT interpretation on the ground that it contradicts Judaism's interpretation.
However, the vast amount of difference between the expectations of what the Messiah is for Judaism, and what the Messiah is for Christianity makes those two concepts mutually exclusive.
Give yourself a good knock in the head for that please. The whole POINT of the corroboration from the Messiah Texts is that it shows that Judaism does NOT have the exclusively different expectation for the Messiah that you are claiming it does.
This message has been edited by Faith, 12-29-2005 11:50 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by ramoss, posted 12-29-2005 11:42 AM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by ramoss, posted 12-29-2005 2:55 PM Faith has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 198 of 233 (273848)
12-29-2005 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by ramoss
12-28-2005 9:13 PM


Re: prophecy
Ramoss, it basically boils down to what is and what is not the Holy Spirit. The Spirit of God is the One, from the Christian perspective, than "reinterprets" the prophecy, but keep in mind that some prophecies don't really match that well for some natural thing anyway, such as Ezekiel's prophecy, and if you were to really look into it, I think you would see there is an obvious pattern in the word of God, and as you see this pattern, it becomes clear that the higher meaning was there all along and intended by God all along.
Keep in mind there were different writers for most books over a wide range of time, and yet the higher, more spiritualized readings of the text are even more consistent than the natural reading often, as if all along God had a deeper, later fulfillment in mind in inspiring the author or prophet to express things a certain way.
For example, the passage in Isaiah referring to explicitly to Jesus' death works and fits far better for Jesus than for Israel which is how people saw it before. It is pretty darn well obvious it refers to Jesus, and since the identical passage was found in the Dead Seas scrolls, it's clear it was not changed after the fact either.
Even some weaker examples, in terms of arguing for reference to Christ, are worth looking at, like "out of Egypt have I called my son" which was taken to refer to Israel as a whole, but fits the life of Jesus too.
Now, this would be hard to explain unless you receive the Holy Spirit and get his help, but the Bible does not just contain a deeper level referring to Jesus, but to spiritual principles and things within Christ as well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by ramoss, posted 12-28-2005 9:13 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by ramoss, posted 12-29-2005 2:58 PM randman has replied
 Message 205 by purpledawn, posted 12-29-2005 3:40 PM randman has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 199 of 233 (273849)
12-29-2005 1:14 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by Faith
12-28-2005 10:35 PM


Re: Prophecy fraud
Faith, good point. I think jar feels like anyone that says they are a Christian and believes in the golden rule, basically is all that is necessary to be a Christian, and that the Bible is probably something to be avoided. His religion is reduced to a moral code, and thus anything beyond that he derides.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by Faith, posted 12-28-2005 10:35 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by AdminAsgara, posted 12-29-2005 1:15 PM randman has not replied

  
AdminAsgara
Administrator (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 2073
From: The Universe
Joined: 10-11-2003


Message 200 of 233 (273850)
12-29-2005 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by randman
12-29-2005 1:14 PM


Re: Prophecy fraud
Is there a reason that you continue to tell people what other members believe? Why don't you leave it up to the individual to state their beliefs?

AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures

  • Thread Reopen Requests

  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month Forum"

  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
  • See also Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC, and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting
    http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 199 by randman, posted 12-29-2005 1:14 PM randman has not replied

      
    randman 
    Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
    Posts: 6367
    Joined: 05-26-2005


    Message 201 of 233 (273852)
    12-29-2005 1:17 PM
    Reply to: Message 175 by jar
    12-28-2005 6:56 PM


    Re: Did They Write About Jesus in the Law, the Prophets, and the Psalms?
    Jar, if that is the case, if there is another unfulfilled prophecy, then Jesus stating it refers to John is evidence Jesus believes prophecy can have more than one fulfillment.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 175 by jar, posted 12-28-2005 6:56 PM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 202 by jar, posted 12-29-2005 1:23 PM randman has replied

      
    jar
    Member (Idle past 415 days)
    Posts: 34026
    From: Texas!!
    Joined: 04-20-2004


    Message 202 of 233 (273857)
    12-29-2005 1:23 PM
    Reply to: Message 201 by randman
    12-29-2005 1:17 PM


    Re: Did They Write About Jesus in the Law, the Prophets, and the Psalms?
    Jar, if that is the case, if there is another unfulfilled prophecy, then Jesus stating it refers to John is evidence Jesus believes prophecy can have more than one fulfillment.
    I do not understand your comment. Are you saying that Jesus referenced Malachi 3:1?

    Aslan is not a Tame Lion

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 201 by randman, posted 12-29-2005 1:17 PM randman has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 206 by randman, posted 12-29-2005 4:30 PM jar has replied

      
    ramoss
    Member (Idle past 633 days)
    Posts: 3228
    Joined: 08-11-2004


    Message 203 of 233 (273870)
    12-29-2005 2:55 PM
    Reply to: Message 197 by Faith
    12-29-2005 11:49 AM


    Re: Messiah Texts
    quote:
    That's interesting. So you think some medieval rabbis might have shared a source with the New Testament commentators? That would be even more evidence for the NT's interpretations of prophecy.
    Nope, not at all. I woudl say the that Talmud writers might have had a common source from the gospel writers.
    If you want to go to the medival rabbi's, their view is probably corrupted by their surrounded culture (christianity).
    quote:
    It certainly would be strong evidence in favor of the NT, since after all the whole objection you have of the NT interpretations is that they misread the OT and contradict Judaism. So if some rabbis at any time or place agree with them at all, your objection is undermined.
    Not at all. That is just your hopeful projection. It appears you have made a decision, and view all information as validation of your predetermined answer.
    quote:
    Well, gee, ramoss, take the next logical step here. If the idea is the same, that has important implications for the objection to NT interpretation on the ground that it contradicts Judaism's interpretation.
    You are missing the entire point. You are trying to 'PROVE' your interpretion superior using your interpretation. That is pretty ciruclar if you ask me. I am saying the two interpretations are totally unrelated, because of the primary assumptions. Just because
    the one side is wrong doesn't mean the other side is right.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 197 by Faith, posted 12-29-2005 11:49 AM Faith has not replied

      
    ramoss
    Member (Idle past 633 days)
    Posts: 3228
    Joined: 08-11-2004


    Message 204 of 233 (273873)
    12-29-2005 2:58 PM
    Reply to: Message 198 by randman
    12-29-2005 1:11 PM


    Re: prophecy
    Basically, the concept of the HOLY SPIRIT is WAY different in Christianity than it is for Judaism. That point blows all your comments and assumptions out of the water when comparing the two.
    And, no, there is no passage in Isaiah that refers to Jesus's death. If you are refering to Isaiah 53, if you read it IN CONTEXT, using the allegories that are used throught the Isaiah 3 text, it is obvious that
    the writer was refering to the nation of Israel as the suffering servant. If you read it further, that even IF you take it as a messanic passage, (which a few minority rabbi's have done), it can not be Jesus because it describes situations that are mutually exclusive with the story's about Jesus in the Gospels.
    On Edit: The 'Out of Egypt' story appears to be just a story that Matthew made up to be able to use that line. Writing a story based
    on scripture to make it appear that scripture is 'prophecising' the line in the story is just trying to shoehorn 'prophecies' into place.
    This message has been edited by ramoss, 12-29-2005 03:01 PM

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 198 by randman, posted 12-29-2005 1:11 PM randman has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 207 by randman, posted 12-29-2005 4:46 PM ramoss has replied

      
    purpledawn
    Member (Idle past 3478 days)
    Posts: 4453
    From: Indiana
    Joined: 04-25-2004


    Message 205 of 233 (273882)
    12-29-2005 3:40 PM
    Reply to: Message 198 by randman
    12-29-2005 1:11 PM


    Prophecy Specifics
    quote:
    For example, the passage in Isaiah referring to explicitly to Jesus' death works and fits far better for Jesus than for Israel which is how people saw it before. It is pretty darn well obvious it refers to Jesus, and since the identical passage was found in the Dead Seas scrolls, it's clear it was not changed after the fact either.
    Don't just say it, show it. IOW, please address the specifics of the verse. List the book, verse, etc. and explain how the words pertain to Jesus.
    Give the methods of the more spiritualized reading.
    What supports a hidden prophecy other than that's just what Christians prefer to do?
    As I asked before, which you really didn't answer:
    How do you tell which prophecies will be fulfilled again?
    How do you know which act is the final fulfillment of a prophecy?
    I am asking these questions because without some rule of thumb to gage by, you leave those weaker in spirit open to fakes.
    If your only support is that without the Holy Spirit, which you assume we don't have because we disagree with you, we can't understand, then what do you hope to contribute to this topic?

    There are two ways of spreading light: to be the candle or the mirror that reflects it. -Edith Wharton

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 198 by randman, posted 12-29-2005 1:11 PM randman has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 208 by randman, posted 12-29-2005 4:46 PM purpledawn has not replied

      
    randman 
    Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
    Posts: 6367
    Joined: 05-26-2005


    Message 206 of 233 (273895)
    12-29-2005 4:30 PM
    Reply to: Message 202 by jar
    12-29-2005 1:23 PM


    Re: Did They Write About Jesus in the Law, the Prophets, and the Psalms?
    Jesus called John the Baptist the fulfillment of Elijah coming again.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 202 by jar, posted 12-29-2005 1:23 PM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 209 by jar, posted 12-29-2005 4:55 PM randman has replied

      
    randman 
    Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
    Posts: 6367
    Joined: 05-26-2005


    Message 207 of 233 (273904)
    12-29-2005 4:46 PM
    Reply to: Message 204 by ramoss
    12-29-2005 2:58 PM


    Re: prophecy
    First off, the Suffering Servant is sinless and Israel has never been described that way, but here is a link to some arguments for Jesus as the Suffering Servant.
    http://www.chaim.org/nation.htm
    My own understanding came from reading the text itself. Personally, I think at times it is futile to argue about this. If you want to beleive differently, that's your business. Imo, the text is abundantly clear on it's own.
    Here is some evidence Jewish scholars believed the Messiah is to be the Suffering Servant.
    Maybe you weren't told, but many ancient rabbinic sources understood Isaiah 53 as referring to the Messiah. Here are quotations from some of them:
    Babylonian Talmud: "The Messiah --what is his name?...The Rabbis say, The Leper Scholar, as it is said, `surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him a leper, smitten of God and afflicted...'" (Sanhedrin 98b)
    Midrash Ruth Rabbah: "Another explanation (of Ruth ii.14): -- He is speaking of king Messiah; `Come hither,' draw near to the throne; `and eat of the bread,' that is, the bread of the kingdom; `and dip thy morsel in the vinegar,' this refers to his chastisements, as it is said, `But he was wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities'"
    Targum Jonathan: "Behold my servant Messiah shall prosper; he shall be high and increase and be exceedingly strong..."
    Zohar: "`He was wounded for our transgressions,' etc....There is in the Garden of Eden a palace called the Palace of the Sons of Sickness; this palace the Messiah then enters, and summons every sickness, every pain, and every chastisement of Israel; they all come and rest upon him. And were it not that he had thus lightened them off Israel and taken them upon himself, there had been no man able to bear Israel's chastisements for the transgression of the law: and this is that which is written, `Surely our sicknesses he hath carried.'"
    Rabbi Moses Maimonides: "What is the manner of Messiah's advent....there shall rise up one of whom none have known before, and signs and wonders which they shall see performed by him will be the proofs of his true origin; for the Almighty, where he declares to us his mind upon this matter, says, `Behold a man whose name is the Branch, and he shall branch forth out of his place' (Zech. 6:12). And Isaiah speaks similarly of the time when he shall appear, without father or mother or family being known, He came up as a sucker before him, and as a root out of dry earth, etc....in the words of Isaiah, when describing the manner in which kings will harken to him, At him kings will shut their mouth; for that which had not been told them have they seen, and that which they had not heard they have perceived." (From the Letter to the South (Yemen), quoted in The Fifty-third Chapter of Isaiah According to the Jewish Interpreters, Ktav Publishing House, 1969, Volume 2, pages 374-5)
    http://www.chaim.org/rabbis.htm
    Here is the text.
    2For He shall grow up before Him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground. He hath no form nor comeliness, and when we shall see Him, there is no beauty that we should desire Him.
    3He is despised and rejected of men, a Man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief. And we hid as it were our faces from Him; He was despised, and we esteemed Him not.
    4Surely He hath borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we did esteem Him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
    5But He was wounded for our transgressions; He was bruised for our iniquities. The chastisement of our peace was upon Him, and with His stripes we are healed.
    6All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on Him the iniquity of us all.
    7He was oppressed, and He was afflicted, yet He opened not his mouth; He is brought as a lamb to the slaughter; and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so He openeth not His mouth.
    8He was taken from prison and from judgment; and who shall declare His generation? For He was cut off out of the land of the living; for the transgression of My people was He stricken.
    9And He made His grave with the wicked, and with the rich in His death, because He had done no violence, neither was any deceit in His mouth.
    10Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise Him; He hath put Him to grief. When thou shalt make His soul an offering for sin, He shall see His seed, He shall prolong His days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in His hand.
    11He shall see of the travail of His soul, and shall be satisfied. By His knowledge shall My righteous Servant justify many, for He shall bear their iniquities.
    Isaiah 53 KJ21 - Who hath believed our report? And to - Bible Gateway
    Imo, the issue is not scholarship, but whether people want to believe or not. If you don't want to believe, you will read the text one way with that bias in mind, and try to find reasons to reject it, and if you are open to believing or want to find meaning and deeper truth in the Bible, you will find it.
    There are those that argue it is wrong to look for something, as if looking with faith causes an unreasonable outcome, but the Bible's stance and the believer's stance is you cannot have reason working correct in respect to spiritual things without starting out from a stance of faith. It takes faith to become aware of certain realms of spiritual illumination. If you start out ruling out faith, then you are limiting your reason and ability to grasp certain spiritual truths.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 204 by ramoss, posted 12-29-2005 2:58 PM ramoss has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 213 by ramoss, posted 12-29-2005 5:14 PM randman has replied
     Message 232 by purpledawn, posted 12-30-2005 1:39 PM randman has not replied

      
    randman 
    Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
    Posts: 6367
    Joined: 05-26-2005


    Message 208 of 233 (273905)
    12-29-2005 4:46 PM
    Reply to: Message 205 by purpledawn
    12-29-2005 3:40 PM


    Re: Prophecy Specifics
    see post 207

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 205 by purpledawn, posted 12-29-2005 3:40 PM purpledawn has not replied

      
    jar
    Member (Idle past 415 days)
    Posts: 34026
    From: Texas!!
    Joined: 04-20-2004


    Message 209 of 233 (273908)
    12-29-2005 4:55 PM
    Reply to: Message 206 by randman
    12-29-2005 4:30 PM


    Re: Did They Write About Jesus in the Law, the Prophets, and the Psalms?
    Chapter and Verse please.
    Just so we can be sure we are speaking of the same passages.
    This message has been edited by jar, 12-29-2005 03:56 PM

    Aslan is not a Tame Lion

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 206 by randman, posted 12-29-2005 4:30 PM randman has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 210 by randman, posted 12-29-2005 4:57 PM jar has replied

      
    randman 
    Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
    Posts: 6367
    Joined: 05-26-2005


    Message 210 of 233 (273909)
    12-29-2005 4:57 PM
    Reply to: Message 209 by jar
    12-29-2005 4:55 PM


    Re: Did They Write About Jesus in the Law, the Prophets, and the Psalms?
    Edit: OK, I see where you are referring to Jesus' words not Isaiah 53. Are you not already familiar with Jesus's words abotu John the Baptist?
    Matthew 11: 14-15, for one
    This message has been edited by randman, 12-29-2005 05:00 PM

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 209 by jar, posted 12-29-2005 4:55 PM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 211 by jar, posted 12-29-2005 4:59 PM randman has replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024