Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is the bible the word of God or men?
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 3 of 309 (429960)
10-22-2007 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by pelican
10-22-2007 3:39 AM


Re: Bible is no big deal
Surely as the bible is said to be inspired by god through man's thoughts, imaginations and experiences, then so is every other book.
What's the big deal? The big deal is what human's make of it.
That is one of it's major problems, what humans make of it. Many humans make it just what they want it to mean.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by pelican, posted 10-22-2007 3:39 AM pelican has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Force, posted 10-22-2007 8:44 PM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 104 of 309 (437758)
12-01-2007 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by IamJoseph
12-01-2007 7:51 AM


Re: Obstinate Rubbish
The entire passage. if this is the Geneology of the world why is there no mention of northern Europe, East Asia, Southern Africa, North & South America, Australia or Oceania. Everyone is in Mesopotamia, Northeast Africa & Central Asia

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by IamJoseph, posted 12-01-2007 7:51 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by IamJoseph, posted 12-01-2007 8:04 PM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 112 of 309 (438136)
12-02-2007 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by IamJoseph
12-02-2007 9:33 PM


Re: DEFINE 'INFINITY' - BEFORE QUESTIONING IT?
The text says the OT was written by Moses,
What text?

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by IamJoseph, posted 12-02-2007 9:33 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by IamJoseph, posted 12-03-2007 1:08 AM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 130 of 309 (438424)
12-04-2007 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Nimrod
12-04-2007 12:28 PM


Re: When you say "Palestinian" you are saying "Israelite"!
The Philistines dwelt in cities and controlled much of the coast, and the term 'Palestine' is cognate with the word Philistine,[3] That area was known in Greek sources from the mid 5th century BCE as Palaistina. When the Romans defeated the Jewish rebellion of 67-70 CE, and merged the province of Judea with Galilee, Samaria and Idumaea, the name Palaestina was applied to the newly formed larger unit.
The ethnic affiliation of the Philistines is not clear. The Philistine names preserved on inscriptions appear to 'contradict the notion that they were Greek-speakers'.[4] Some scholars argue however that they were a non-Semitic group, with roots in Southern Greece dating back to the period of early Mycenaean civilization.[5] Inhabiting a smaller area on the southern coast called Philistia, whose borders approximate the modern Gaza Strip, Philistia comprised a confederation of five city states: Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod on the coast and Ekron, and Gath inland.[6]
Egyptian texts of the temple at Medinet Habu, record a people called the P-r-s-t (conventionally Peleset), one of the Sea Peoples who invaded Egypt in Ramesses III's reign. This is considered very likely to be a reference to the Philistines. The Hebrew name Peleshet (— Pléshseth), usually translated as Philistia in English, is used in the Bible to denote their southern coastal region.[citation needed]
The Assyrian emperor Sargon II called the region the Palashtu in his Annals. By the time of Assyrian rule in 722 BCE, the Philistines had become 'part and parcel of the local population',[7][8] and prospered under Assyrian rule during the seventh century despite occasional rebellions against their overlords.[6] In 604 BCE, when Assyrian troops commanded by the Babylonian empire carried off significant numbers of the population into slavery, the distinctly Philistine character of the coastal cities dwindled away,[7][9] and the history of the Philistine people effectively ended.[6]
from Wikipedia

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Nimrod, posted 12-04-2007 12:28 PM Nimrod has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by IamJoseph, posted 12-04-2007 9:24 PM bluescat48 has not replied
 Message 135 by Nimrod, posted 12-05-2007 1:55 AM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 185 of 309 (439355)
12-08-2007 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 183 by IamJoseph
12-08-2007 1:21 AM


This is incorrect: only jews were referred to as palestine prior to 1960. Because this was the Jewish homeland. It was never a muslim palestinian homeland. jews have lived here 4000 years. Nor did jews live peacably in Arab lands: just because there was no holocaust is hardly an applicable marker here. And why should Jews depend on Islamic generosity [sic] - they have a homeland.
If that is the case why would the British Government, which had a mandate on the area, after WW1 until the formation of Israel, issue stamps, in 1920, with Palestine in Arabic, English & Hebrew. if only Jews lived there?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by IamJoseph, posted 12-08-2007 1:21 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by IamJoseph, posted 12-08-2007 8:56 PM bluescat48 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024