Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creation of the Earth v.s. creation of man
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5090 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 48 of 57 (274432)
12-31-2005 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Jon
12-31-2005 6:08 AM


As simple as your argument is conveyed, we cannot do that because some people do not accept the idea of carbon dating as being accurate. Which is why when we start checking out the oldest writing is how some of us date humans.
Though to be truthful we could probably date humans by other things as well like pottery and stuff instead of writing because pottery has been around longer then writing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Jon, posted 12-31-2005 6:08 AM Jon has not replied

  
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5090 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 55 of 57 (275475)
01-03-2006 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Jon
01-02-2006 6:13 AM


Basically i think what Arachophilia is point out is that you can date Genesis to aproximately 900 B.C. due to place errors mentioned in the text.
An example of this would be any history textbook that labeled San Jose as the current capital of the state of California. Since San Jose was the capital 1850-1854 the history book would then have to be written at latest in 1854.
Similiarly i think genesis would be dated to 900 B.C. because of the name of cities that were present at that time frame.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Jon, posted 01-02-2006 6:13 AM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by arachnophilia, posted 01-04-2006 4:37 AM Discreet Label has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024