You assume that you understand why an atheist is an atheist. Wow, that is a bold statement. There are a lot of athiests out there. You suggest that the belief of God is incomprehendable to athiest. Well, then you must assume that the athiest point of view cannot be fully understood by you. However, you still assume that you know why and how we came to our points of view. Well let me give you my account. I simply see no proof of God. I have persued the argument and still find nothing. So, when you have an argument for me to hear that is not merely an assumption of my simple mind than let us hear it. Until then there are few who are interested in somebody giving a sphycoanalysis that is groundless.