Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9057 total)
493 online now:
AZPaul3, kjsimons (2 members, 491 visitors)
Newest Member: drlove
Post Volume: Total: 889,936 Year: 1,048/6,534 Month: 1,048/682 Week: 101/182 Day: 22/24 Hour: 0/8

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Self-Replicating Molecules - Life's Building Blocks (Part II)
Member (Idle past 2447 days)
Posts: 159
Joined: 04-14-2014

Message 21 of 97 (724972)
04-23-2014 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by dwise1
04-19-2011 1:25 AM

Re: Probability
dwise1 writes:

But that's not the important part. I read Richard Dawkins' description of his WEASEL and do you know what my reaction was? Disbelief! I had already been an atheist for 25 years. I had already started learning about evolution and been supportive thereof thoroughly convinced thereof for at least 20 years. But I could not believe what he had just told me. So what did I do? I put it to the test! I wrote my own WEASEL, albeit named MONKEY, and I tested it. And, not believing the results I saw, I analyzed it! And in the end I found that it was right and I knew why it was right!

-Argument from personal experience isn't very convincing.
dwise1 writes:

Would you do the same? Would you take a creationist claim and test it? Would you ever even question any creationist claim?

Here's one, from Kent Hovind.

-Straw man. I don't listen to Kent Hovind. He seems to be a YEC, and as such does not represent the thinking of ID.
Why not choose Stephen Meyer? I have analyzed much of his arguments.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by dwise1, posted 04-19-2011 1:25 AM dwise1 has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-23-2014 1:40 PM Ed67 has not yet responded
 Message 23 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-23-2014 2:14 PM Ed67 has not yet responded

Member (Idle past 2447 days)
Posts: 159
Joined: 04-14-2014

Message 24 of 97 (725139)
04-24-2014 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
06-24-2009 10:38 PM

RAZD writes:

This does not explain all the questions of how life developed on earth over 3.5 billion years ago, but it goes a long way in showing how possible it was for life to develop from existing chemicals in the conditions that existed in the pre-biotic earth.

I realized that [the RNA world hypotheses] presupposed or ignored, rather than explained, the origin of SEQUENCE SPECIFICITY - INFORMATION - in various RNA molecules
"Signature in the Cell", by Stephen Meyer, p. 312

So you haven't explained how the complex, specified information could have been generated. Your sources simply state:

"Evolution did it - POOF". That's, again, a statement of faith, not supported by any of the facts you presented.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 06-24-2009 10:38 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-24-2014 2:12 PM Ed67 has not yet responded
 Message 27 by Pressie, posted 04-25-2014 4:13 AM Ed67 has not yet responded
 Message 28 by RAZD, posted 04-25-2014 7:37 AM Ed67 has not yet responded
 Message 29 by AZPaul3, posted 04-26-2014 8:05 AM Ed67 has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022