Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8925 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-19-2019 5:12 PM
30 online now:
1.61803, AZPaul3, dwise1, Faith, JonF, RAZD, ringo, Tangle, Tanypteryx, Theodoric (10 members, 20 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jedothek
Post Volume:
Total: 860,032 Year: 15,068/19,786 Month: 1,791/3,058 Week: 165/404 Day: 52/113 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Self-Replicating Molecules - Life's Building Blocks (Part II)
Ed67
Member (Idle past 1556 days)
Posts: 159
Joined: 04-14-2014


Message 21 of 97 (724972)
04-23-2014 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by dwise1
04-19-2011 1:25 AM


Re: Probability
dwise1 writes:

But that's not the important part. I read Richard Dawkins' description of his WEASEL and do you know what my reaction was? Disbelief! I had already been an atheist for 25 years. I had already started learning about evolution and been supportive thereof thoroughly convinced thereof for at least 20 years. But I could not believe what he had just told me. So what did I do? I put it to the test! I wrote my own WEASEL, albeit named MONKEY, and I tested it. And, not believing the results I saw, I analyzed it! And in the end I found that it was right and I knew why it was right!


-Argument from personal experience isn't very convincing.
dwise1 writes:

Would you do the same? Would you take a creationist claim and test it? Would you ever even question any creationist claim?

Here's one, from Kent Hovind.

-Straw man. I don't listen to Kent Hovind. He seems to be a YEC, and as such does not represent the thinking of ID.
Why not choose Stephen Meyer? I have analyzed much of his arguments.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by dwise1, posted 04-19-2011 1:25 AM dwise1 has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-23-2014 1:40 PM Ed67 has not yet responded
 Message 23 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-23-2014 2:14 PM Ed67 has not yet responded

    
Ed67
Member (Idle past 1556 days)
Posts: 159
Joined: 04-14-2014


Message 24 of 97 (725139)
04-24-2014 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
06-24-2009 10:38 PM


RAZD writes:

This does not explain all the questions of how life developed on earth over 3.5 billion years ago, but it goes a long way in showing how possible it was for life to develop from existing chemicals in the conditions that existed in the pre-biotic earth.

quote:
I realized that [the RNA world hypotheses] presupposed or ignored, rather than explained, the origin of SEQUENCE SPECIFICITY - INFORMATION - in various RNA molecules
"Signature in the Cell", by Stephen Meyer, p. 312

So you haven't explained how the complex, specified information could have been generated. Your sources simply state:

"Evolution did it - POOF". That's, again, a statement of faith, not supported by any of the facts you presented.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 06-24-2009 10:38 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-24-2014 2:12 PM Ed67 has not yet responded
 Message 27 by Pressie, posted 04-25-2014 4:13 AM Ed67 has not yet responded
 Message 28 by RAZD, posted 04-25-2014 7:37 AM Ed67 has not yet responded
 Message 29 by AZPaul3, posted 04-26-2014 8:05 AM Ed67 has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019