Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-20-2019 10:32 PM
27 online now:
dwise1, jar, kjsimons, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), xongsmith (5 members, 22 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: anglagard
Post Volume:
Total: 857,225 Year: 12,261/19,786 Month: 2,042/2,641 Week: 551/708 Day: 110/135 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abiogenesis - Or Better Living Through Chemistry
tsjok45
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 85 (63912)
11-02-2003 7:58 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Bart007
09-15-2002 3:47 PM


Halloliladadidads...

Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe abiogenesis is impossible as based upon scientific considerations only
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Again some “brand- new” loads of non scientific “considerations “( ? ) then , I suppose ?

I prefer to call that kind of strategies quackery , you know ?

You will use what ?
“medicine –doctors” treatments ? ,
Voodoo , alchemy ?
some magic ?
some new age ?
you’ ll pray for me ?
what’s next
ah yes , nearly forgot it ;
___ the supernatural miracle “being(s) “ , ( blessed is THE id , I mean - )
So What ?

Well it SHALL be based on scientific “considerations “ alone

Is there something else we can accept
that is
is “understandeable” and fit enough to be “communicated “ / discussed / “revealed “ to human beings
( = non-gullible, “non-morons” ) ?
At least a common " code " " language " "agreed upon common ground "
that is installing "compatibility " between all members in a
communication network ...

Is there ?

Is this reintroduction of irrationality only "a nice try ... to “rewin” apostates ? "... or will these sinners be “punished “ and “lost for ever “ ?

How you 'll do this ?

Iow –( I summarise )
are you going to use some tricks of psychology and rhetorics or
will you stick to methodologic naturalism ?
and if not ? why not ?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Bart007, posted 09-15-2002 3:47 PM Bart007 has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019