Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,837 Year: 4,094/9,624 Month: 965/974 Week: 292/286 Day: 13/40 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Murchison Meteor Questions
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 216 (422045)
09-15-2007 4:13 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Rob
09-15-2007 1:24 PM


Re: Keeping Things Simple
Rob writes:
I agree wholeheartedly!
So, do youhave any evidence for prebiotic organisms that dispove the appearence of design in the biotic organisms in light of their de novo appearence?
note to admins.. if the discourse between Crash and I get's prickly, please shut him down. I'd really like to keep things civil. Intelligent questions and intelligent answers. I'll just ignore extreme sarcasm.
I've been reading this interesting thread and see it as humming along quite well so far as behavior on both sides.
Regarding your concerns about Crashfrog his remarks are what afforded the opportunity for you to counter his argument with your own cogent question to him.
At this point I see no need of admin action but will continue to monitor so far as behavior relative to all participants.

For ideological balance on the EvC admin team as a Biblical creationist.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC, Assistance w/ Forum Formatting, Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics, Official Invitations to Online Chat@EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Rob, posted 09-15-2007 1:24 PM Rob has not replied

  
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 216 (422338)
09-16-2007 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Rob
09-16-2007 5:27 PM


Re: So far so good as Buzz said...
Rob writes:
I also know that AdminBuzzsaw is keeping a watch over the thread, and so far no foul called (and he is a brother). So... it must be staying close enough to be within parameters. Not to mention that this is Percy's forum, and if anyone has drifted off topic it is he and I.
1. My moderating in this thread is pretty much limited to behavior as I am not science apprised enough to judge the science of this topic. I continue to monitor the behavior aspect of it but other than that don't expect much from me in moderating here. I moderated the thread on your request for moderation pertaining to a behavior matter.
2. Since it was Admin who promoted the thread, perhaps he will want to moderate on the science aspects of the thread. I do think member Percy would be wise to refrain from moderation as member Percy as it appears he's doing a little of. Of course we all tend to do a bit of moderating as members as some others have here which I don't see objectionable. My suggestion is that he do any significant moderation as Admin.

For ideological balance on the EvC admin team as a Biblical creationist.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC, Assistance w/ Forum Formatting, Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics, Official Invitations to Online Chat@EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Rob, posted 09-16-2007 5:27 PM Rob has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Admin, posted 09-16-2007 9:34 PM AdminBuzsaw has replied

  
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 64 of 216 (422399)
09-16-2007 11:46 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by Admin
09-16-2007 9:34 PM


Re: So far so good as Buzz said...
Admin writes:
Rob is very persistently making many complaints about member behavior in this thread, and my name keeps coming up, so here's just one suggestion. I think it might be better if Rob focused his attention in this thread on the topic of discussion and take any complaints to the moderation thread.
Thanks Admin. You're right and I concur that members are not suppose to clutter threads with behavior complaints. (Rob, I hope you take note as you proceed in this thread.) This was an oversight on my part.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Admin, posted 09-16-2007 9:34 PM Admin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by Rob, posted 09-17-2007 1:15 AM AdminBuzsaw has not replied

  
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 165 of 216 (423399)
09-21-2007 7:48 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by Rob
09-21-2007 2:11 AM


Re: Problems with Murchison extractions...
Rob writes:
Was this paper peer reviewed? Or does it take a truck driver with a high school education, to do a thorough and objective job of moderating the work of men with 'doctorates'?
From my perspective you appear to be doing quite a good job presenting your arguments. I continue to monitor your manner of dialog as well as your counterparts and it appears that for the most part all are doing fine. The only reason I'm citing the above now is to caution you that it's these kinds of remarks that begin to make problems for the creationist minority folks like you, me and others which likely you're aware of by now.
The science educated people we debate and dialog with in science have invested a great amount of expense and time into acquiring the knowledge they have. You, I and others who believe science is mistaken in some of their conclusions need not compromise our positions so long as we feel we can support them but being the minority we get along better when we are all the more careful to show due respect in the threads for the science professionals.
I hope you don't mind some constructive criticism. You're a valuable asset to the creo team here with the potential of doing exploits as the prophet Daniel put it in the 12th chapter. I want to do what I can to help your PR here in the science arena where your presence is appreciated by all so far as I can see.
Edited by AdminBuzsaw, : edit to update signature modification

For ideological balance on the EvC admin team as a Biblical creationist.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
EvC Forum: General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 12.0
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC, Assistance w/ Forum Formatting, Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics, Official Invitations to Online Chat@EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Rob, posted 09-21-2007 2:11 AM Rob has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024