|
Author
|
Topic: Abiogenesis
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5053 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 53 of 142 (94421)
03-24-2004 11:21 AM
|
Reply to: Message 51 by RAZD
03-24-2004 2:21 AM
|
|
Re: Viruses, prions and implications
It would be a curious thought indeed if we considered prions as a live and virses as dead. I do hope DNAunion is correct and we are out of Alice's rabbit hole.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 51 by RAZD, posted 03-24-2004 2:21 AM | | RAZD has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 54 by Loudmouth, posted 03-24-2004 12:24 PM | | Brad McFall has not replied | | | Message 55 by RAZD, posted 03-24-2004 12:45 PM | | Brad McFall has replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5053 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 57 of 142 (94942)
03-26-2004 11:05 AM
|
Reply to: Message 55 by RAZD
03-24-2004 12:45 PM
|
|
Re: Viruses, prions and curious implications
I think there is presently a FALSE, did iIi say "false" dicotomy of replication and metabolism in mole bio today engendered if not in whole, in part by Freeman Dyson. I know how WRONG in particular but not this particular that Dyson can be AFTER musing over a comment Kaufmann's BOOTS gave my spirit when walking to the chemistry dept at Cornell about Dyson in the field. I think making this explict is furthering only the current depressive relation of chemisty and psycholy only and may help an artist apply nanotech but no more.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 55 by RAZD, posted 03-24-2004 12:45 PM | | RAZD has replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5053 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 76 of 142 (96059)
03-30-2004 4:59 PM
|
Reply to: Message 59 by RAZD
03-26-2004 12:20 PM
|
|
Re: Viruses, prions and curious implications
I think the standard difference of metabolism and replication has lulled you into a vision of a cell that can indeed be narrower than you represented so far but that really is my opnion and is not something I have ever yet tried to depose on anyone on this board. Best Brad. I heard what DNAUNION said, mind you.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 59 by RAZD, posted 03-26-2004 12:20 PM | | RAZD has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 78 by RAZD, posted 03-30-2004 5:56 PM | | Brad McFall has not replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5053 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
Re: Viruses, prions and curious implications
I have started to discuss this under "incidence vs co-incidence" in another thread. Do you want me to comment to computation directly on what has been going back and forth between DNAu and AL?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 58 by Darwin Storm, posted 03-26-2004 11:15 AM | | Darwin Storm has not replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5053 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 93 of 142 (97032)
04-02-2004 11:27 AM
|
Reply to: Message 90 by DNAunion
04-01-2004 9:50 PM
|
|
Re: Details, man, details
I see you dont need any "help" from me. Brad-oOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOout.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 90 by DNAunion, posted 04-01-2004 9:50 PM | | DNAunion has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2
