Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abiogenesis
secondlaw
Inactive Member


Message 72 of 142 (95970)
03-30-2004 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Trump won
03-07-2004 12:38 AM


jump in the mix
I have not seen anything stated about this in the current thread so I thought I would make mention of it.
In short, mathematically speaking, it is impossible for life to come from non-life.
Given the enormity of the 'age' of the universe, still one does not have enough time or probability for proteins to be developed on their own by chance, let alone DNA.
It's one thing to look at the present circumstances and say, "Because we are, it must have happened." But it is a completely different ball of wax to say that it really did all by chance.
I am sure that DNAunion can attest to the intricacies of DNA, and the difficulties that arise when trying to consider this all just coming together at the right time and making life.
If asked, I have documentation showing statistical evidence that the chance of life from non-life is nil (10 to the power of 1.4 million).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Trump won, posted 03-07-2004 12:38 AM Trump won has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-30-2004 1:17 PM secondlaw has not replied
 Message 74 by RAZD, posted 03-30-2004 1:42 PM secondlaw has not replied
 Message 81 by Admin, posted 03-31-2004 9:32 AM secondlaw has not replied
 Message 82 by Percy, posted 03-31-2004 9:34 AM secondlaw has replied

secondlaw
Inactive Member


Message 80 of 142 (96269)
03-31-2004 7:42 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by RAZD
03-30-2004 5:56 PM


for those interested
I have posted under Lam's "Why do people believe what they believe forum?"
This post has one documentation of mathematical probability and the 'development' of the first cell by chance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by RAZD, posted 03-30-2004 5:56 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by RAZD, posted 03-31-2004 2:59 PM secondlaw has not replied

secondlaw
Inactive Member


Message 84 of 142 (96294)
03-31-2004 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by Percy
03-31-2004 9:34 AM


Re: jump in the mix
I have placed that information in Lam's post of "Why do people believe that they believe?"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Percy, posted 03-31-2004 9:34 AM Percy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024