Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9042 total)
70 online now:
nwr, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tangle, Tanypteryx, Taq (6 members, 64 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 886,019 Year: 3,665/14,102 Month: 285/321 Week: 101/44 Day: 17/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The "Digital Code" of DNA
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5840
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.6


Message 3 of 143 (397578)
04-26-2007 4:43 PM


From Abiogenesis - the closed thread.

Hoot Mon:

I believe its was Hoyle and Wickramasinghe who calculated the probability of the first protein molecule to be on the order 1 in 10^120.

I don’t know about those two and I’m being lazy in not looking them up, but, seems to me the first question is “What first protein?” Proteins are chains of amino acids. Reasonable speculations indicate a whole slog of aminos in a pre-biotic Earth environment. Doesn’t seem to me to be so far fetched that two such thingies glom on to each other and viola…first protein. Probably doesn’t do much except float around looking for more candidates to join with.

10 to some big number seems a bit linear in thinking, doesn’t it? If we’re talking some large mega-protein like hemoglobin then I can understand the incredulity of its spontaneous generation, but, I hope this is not what is being offered here.

Cannot a simple chain of, say 5 aminos, or maybe even 50 aminos, not be considered a protein? The incredulity certainly lessens at this level. And if we take the reasonable assumption of many millions of trials daily over many millions of years, does this not lessen it even more?


Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Fosdick, posted 04-27-2007 12:23 PM AZPaul3 has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021