Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,488 Year: 3,745/9,624 Month: 616/974 Week: 229/276 Day: 5/64 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Science rejects Abiogenesis
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 40 (18648)
09-30-2002 9:03 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Bart007
09-30-2002 8:43 PM


"Perhaps you can share something specific that science knows about Evolution that affirms Evolution. If you can come up with, let say, 3 or 4 that science KNOWS about Evlution, then perhaps we can agrre that Wilder-Smith's Title was Asinine. But let's focus on one at a time."
--I don't think SLPx Will have any difficulty providing you with this data..I sure wouldn't. I am also in wonder of why and how this provision of data regarding the ToE has anything to do with whether or not a title of a book is silly or stupid.
------------------
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 09-30-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Bart007, posted 09-30-2002 8:43 PM Bart007 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Bart007, posted 09-30-2002 10:31 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024