Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8984 total)
51 online now:
jar, PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat), scoff, Tangle (5 members, 46 visitors)
Newest Member: Jerry Johnson
Post Volume: Total: 877,690 Year: 9,438/23,288 Month: 453/1,544 Week: 167/561 Day: 7/63 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   questions evolutionists can't or won't answer
gene90
Member (Idle past 2373 days)
Posts: 1610
Joined: 12-25-2000


Message 117 of 141 (17462)
09-15-2002 3:45 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by Bart007
09-15-2002 3:14 PM


[QUOTE][B]And there exist no rational reason for this evolutionary history to be missing, if evolution be true.[/QUOTE]

[/B]

Actually there are rational reasons. You can't get many fossils without hard parts for one. For another the Cambrian has had lots of time to be modified by metamorphism.

The first part of your post wasn't clear, perhaps you could elaborate?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Bart007, posted 09-15-2002 3:14 PM Bart007 has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020