I think Brian's point may well have been quite simple, but let me flesh out one reading of it.
All we have is your word for it that you haven't lost a debate. Your posts so far have been poorly argued, puerile and almost entirely derivative largely lifted almost verbatim from Hovind et al.
That you represent other's statements as your own, or other's logic as your own, suggests a certain - how is it put? - "economy with the truth."
Your grasp of logic is extremely poor - especially if "Isaac Newton was a creationist" is one of your four chosen examples.
Given these points it seems most likely that either:
(a) your "successful" debates have been with a kindergarten class for whom English is not the native language;
or (b) your debates have not been successful at all, but you do not realize it.
The third option - that you are merely mendacious - is tempting, but I think you'll find we give you the benefit of the doubt for now.