Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,482 Year: 3,739/9,624 Month: 610/974 Week: 223/276 Day: 63/34 Hour: 2/4


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Origin of Life ⇒

Abiogenisis by the Numbers

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abiogenisis by the Numbers
mikehager
Member (Idle past 6489 days)
Posts: 534
Joined: 09-02-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 45 of 206 (159075)
11-13-2004 1:23 PM 		Reply to: Message 14 by RisenLord
11-12-2004 6:49 PM

Real scientests?
REAL scientists don't make such assumptions to back their dogma.
​
I agree, Risenlord. That's the reason creationism cannot be considered science. Creationism assumes the existence of a creator, which is an inherently unprovable assertion.
​
A creationist looks at evidence and says, "Okay, we know god created everything. How does this fit?"
​
Science looks at evidence and says, "What does this tell us?"
​
Which is making assumptions to support dogma?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by RisenLord, posted 11-12-2004 6:49 PM RisenLord has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024