I have done some research on the topic of abiogenesis, and it seems to me there is virtually no evidence that this is even possible.
I'm afraid that I don't quite understand your objection. If abiogenesis doesn't violate any known law of physics or chemistry, then it must be
possible, yes? So the
lack of evidence that abiogenesis violates the laws of physics is
positive evidence that it is
possible. Unless you are using a different meaning for "possible" than I am?
Speaking personally, I find few things more awesome than contemplating this vast and majestic process of evolution, the ebb and flow of successive biotas through geological time. Creationists and others who cannot for ideological or religious reasons accept the fact of evolution miss out a great deal, and are left with a claustrophobic little universe in which nothing happens and nothing changes.
--
M. Alan Kazlev