Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9072 total)
69 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus) (1 member, 68 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Happy Birthday: Percy
Post Volume: Total: 893,122 Year: 4,234/6,534 Month: 448/900 Week: 154/150 Day: 8/16 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Transition from chemistry to biology
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 283 days)
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 196 of 415 (498969)
02-15-2009 6:57 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by traste
02-14-2009 5:14 AM


Re: We have the building blocks ...
Excuse me.That computation is not for natural selection,it is a computation for protein that they will get it just right through random chance.

Any mathematical model that does not model natural selection is not a model of evolution and has no relevance to it.

Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by traste, posted 02-14-2009 5:14 AM traste has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by traste, posted 02-15-2009 8:57 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 283 days)
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 225 of 415 (499109)
02-16-2009 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 198 by traste
02-15-2009 8:57 PM


Re: We have the building blocks ...
And what is an example of natural selection mathemathical model?Can you provide some?

Read any textbook on genetics.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by traste, posted 02-15-2009 8:57 PM traste has taken no action

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 283 days)
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 255 of 415 (504528)
03-30-2009 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 251 by Peg
03-24-2009 12:07 AM


Lets say we pull a fish out of a fishtank and allow it to suffocate, why can't we breath life back into it again even if all its organs are in completely intact?

Because it is impossible to miraculously breath life into non-living things, since the necessary condition for life is a set of chemical interactions, not miracle breath.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by Peg, posted 03-24-2009 12:07 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 285 by Peg, posted 06-29-2009 7:41 AM Dr Adequate has taken no action

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 283 days)
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 337 of 415 (514305)
07-06-2009 1:28 AM
Reply to: Message 327 by traste
07-05-2009 9:42 PM


Re: Interactions
If you look on the decades of mutation research you will notice that it does not produce anything new.

This is not true.

The research show that mutution is harmful rather than beneficial,since out of 1000 mutation only one is good,yet it is still the same organism.

This is not coherent.

If intellectual men will the history of fraud science abiogenesis will be on the top.

This is not English.

Its not hard to convinced those people who are already convinced.

This, sadly is, true. This is why people like you recite the lies that you've been taught without spending five minutes to find out that they're bullshit.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 327 by traste, posted 07-05-2009 9:42 PM traste has taken no action

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 283 days)
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 340 of 415 (514310)
07-06-2009 5:19 AM
Reply to: Message 338 by traste
07-06-2009 1:53 AM


Re: Your confidinced troubled me
I dont think so and its because of this report:

An increasing number of scientist most particularly a growing number of evolutionist argue that Darwinian evolutionary theory is no genuine scientific theoryu at all many of the critics have the highest intellectual credentials.---( New Scientist)

This is not a real quote. Whatever one may think of "New Scientist", their writers are at least literate.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 338 by traste, posted 07-06-2009 1:53 AM traste has taken no action

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 283 days)
Posts: 16112
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 341 of 415 (514311)
07-06-2009 5:21 AM
Reply to: Message 338 by traste
07-06-2009 1:53 AM


Re: Your confidinced troubled me
Oh, my dear you missed my entire point. My entire point is this. Abiogenesis and spontaneous genaration is similar in the sense that both are implying thta life is came from non- life. Is that idea really hard to grasp??

And alchemy and nuclear physics are similar in that both imply that one element can turn into another.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 338 by traste, posted 07-06-2009 1:53 AM traste has taken no action

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022