Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
438 online now:
(438 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,046 Year: 5,158/6,534 Month: 1/577 Week: 69/135 Day: 1/8 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Transition from chemistry to biology
Woodsy
Member (Idle past 2648 days)
Posts: 301
From: Burlington, Canada
Joined: 08-30-2006


Message 50 of 415 (385794)
02-17-2007 7:41 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by RAZD
02-16-2007 8:01 PM


Re: arbitrary or non-arbitrary?
If one does not accept an ultimate design concept, then logically this non-arbitrary clumping of particles into every increasing complexity makes for a mystery.

The how is the same, the result is the same, but the why is different.

As far as I can see, if the universe and the things in it have properties, as we see that they do, they will exhibit the behaviours that follow from their properties. If the properties had been different, the outcomes would have been too. How could it be otherwise? Why should anyone regard it as mysterious? The fact that something is complex is no excuse for thinking that it is magic.

We can study the hows and the results. The question of the whys may indeed be meaningless. More a trap for the gullible than anything real.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by RAZD, posted 02-16-2007 8:01 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by RAZD, posted 02-17-2007 8:59 AM Woodsy has taken no action

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022