EvC Forum: Transition from chemistry to biology

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Transition from chemistry to biology

Huntard

Member (Idle past 2588 days)

Posts: 2870

From: Limburg, The Netherlands

Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 274 of 415 (510350)
05-30-2009 8:27 AM

Reply to: Message 273 by traste
05-30-2009 8:12 AM

Re: Re:hehehe

traste writes:

Therefore the so called intermidiate forms between fish and amphibians are hard to classify as living things?.hahahaha

That's not what he was saying. Of course those stages were living. But that's not what this thread is about.

Oh, use the quote features like AdminMoose showed you, please, it makes reading your posts so much easier.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
	Message 273 by traste, posted 05-30-2009 8:12 AM		traste has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 275 by traste, posted 05-30-2009 8:38 AM	Huntard has not replied
	Message 276 by traste, posted 05-30-2009 8:41 AM	Huntard has not replied

Huntard

Member (Idle past 2588 days)

Posts: 2870

From: Limburg, The Netherlands

Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 352 of 415 (514383)
07-07-2009 6:55 AM

Reply to: Message 351 by traste
07-07-2009 5:34 AM

Re: Are you a droped out in logic?

First of all, please learn to format your post, it's so much more pleasing to the eye and easy to read (use the "peek" button to see how I formatted my post, or read RAZD's excellent posts on the subject).

traste writes:

The premise of Pasteur's experiment is this. Organic things did not begin from inorganic thing.

Wrong. It was: "CURRENTLY living organic things did not begin from inorganic things".

I don't know how to enable the html.

It's not html. It's dBCode. But as i said, just type what RAZD has told you, or use the "peek" button to see how I, or orther people, do it.

Since evolutionary research suits to find an itch and scratch,therefore it philosophy not science.

And, pray tell, how did you get to that? What do you base this on?

My real point is quoting an authorithy is sensible I say nothing about cosmic constant.

Quoting an authority is only sensible when you can provide evidence for their point. Otherwise it's just an oppinion (however well educated) and doesn't count.

Yes an authorities can be wrong but it doesnt mean that quoting them is always alogical fallacy

If it is to say: "See, he thinks so too, I must be right!" Then yes, it is a logical fallacy.

it is sensible to appeal to someone in a particular field when we are not an expert of that thing.

Not without providing supporting evidence it's not. Further, Pasteur is NOT an expert on abiogenesis.

Take your basic logic lesson.

Indeed....

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
	Message 351 by traste, posted 07-07-2009 5:34 AM		traste has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 363 by traste, posted 07-07-2009 11:39 PM		Huntard has replied

Huntard

Member (Idle past 2588 days)

Posts: 2870

From: Limburg, The Netherlands

Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 365 of 415 (514478)
07-08-2009 1:27 AM

Reply to: Message 363 by traste
07-07-2009 11:39 PM

Re: Are you a droped out in logic?

traste writes:

Err, did you not read this.? " Never will the docrine of spontaneous genaration recover from the mortal blow sruck by this simple experiment"

Yes I did. My observation still stands though. Spontaneous generation is about currently living organisms, and has nothing to do with abiogenesis.

Read the arguments of proponents of evolution and examine the evidence with out prior conviction.

I did. My question stands. You haven't supplied any reason or evidence for your statement.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
	Message 363 by traste, posted 07-07-2009 11:39 PM		traste has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 371 by traste, posted 07-08-2009 11:41 PM		Huntard has replied

Huntard

Member (Idle past 2588 days)

Posts: 2870

From: Limburg, The Netherlands

Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 374 of 415 (514579)
07-09-2009 1:30 AM

Reply to: Message 371 by traste
07-08-2009 11:41 PM

Re: Are you a droped out in logic?

traste writes:

It absolutely does my friend,unless you have prior conviction.

No it doesn't, becasue abiogenensis is about the earilest forms of life arising, not about currently living forms arising. You really need to learn definitions, mate.

And your evidence is?? Have suplied intermidiate form of organism?

If you're asking if there are intermediate forms, yes there are, plenty in fact. This is not the thread to discuss those however.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
	Message 371 by traste, posted 07-08-2009 11:41 PM		traste has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

3 online now:	dwise1, nwr, PaulK
Newest Member:	Cifa.ac
Post Volume:	Total: 920,089 Year: 411/6,935 Month: 411/275 Week: 128/159 Day: 6/33 Hour: 0/0