New abiogenesis news article 4/12/02

(my(our) idea) can get to the any NOT paired condition (say RNA) within fluid-contacts that are UNDER constraint per condition due to thermocontacts and electric evolution (in the sense of generation) for any unconditioned so approached. I know not what this means for Mendel's rational numbers which were emprical to others but what is to stop me from using atomics to numerate this idea?I am begining to wonder if the present QM is due to the historical conservatism for PAIRS which Faraday not argue against since he did not introduce unneeded forces and substances so stuck to bipolar nature of the relation EVEN TO GRAVITY but perhaps mole bio has called for this need ((to know)more).

My guess this "destruction" is NOT in the DNA. I would have tried to model the "space" dielectrically first. The explaination is too involved and no one has taken me up on the preverted twist so I will not say any more than that i think genetic inversions are twistless spring creators... but this only gets me to page 6 in Gould's book.We may have to think of "beneficial viruses" as we already do bacteria. My argument for this involves use of Cantor's number classes so this is much even more too involved than what I wanted to write in the first paragraph above.Thanks for brining this up a second time.