Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Should the Bible contain the Old Testement?
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 6 of 32 (292141)
03-04-2006 2:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by ohnhai
02-23-2006 2:50 AM


Why keep the Old?
I had the impression that the New Testament was exactly that. A new set of rules that replaced the old set in entirety. If this indeed so; then why does the bible, still contain the Old Testament? Surely, as we have been given the second testament via Jesus then, for a Christian, the Old Testament should be meaningless.
My take on it - the Old Testament isn't just rules. There is Genesis (which Jesus doesn't throw out) and the history of the Jewish people. That stuff is important to Christians. I guess the rules are kept there for historical purposes...also it gives important context. If Jesus is throwing out the old rules, it might be useful to know what rules they are and why they are being replaced.
One more reason is because of the Messiah prophecies.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ohnhai, posted 02-23-2006 2:50 AM ohnhai has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by ramoss, posted 03-06-2006 11:56 AM Modulous has not replied
 Message 13 by Philip, posted 03-20-2006 10:29 AM Modulous has not replied
 Message 30 by Eliyahu, posted 10-20-2013 1:40 AM Modulous has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024