Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 67 (9030 total)
134 online now:
jar, PaulK (2 members, 132 visitors)
Newest Member: BodhitSLAVa
Post Volume: Total: 884,412 Year: 2,058/14,102 Month: 426/624 Week: 147/163 Day: 2/38 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   The Problems with Genesis: A Christian Evolutionist's View
Posts: 2261
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006
Member Rating: 10.0

Message 63 of 200 (484702)
10-01-2008 3:44 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by gluadys
10-01-2008 2:18 AM

FYI gluadys, IAJ rejects nearly all physics and chemistry due to radioactivity, all geology period, and nearly all biology due to the rejection of evolution and genetics. His big argument against all natural sciences is that nothing has been discovered prior to 3100 BCE indicating writing. He simply implies that without writing there can be no speech.

Of course that belief is against the current state of knowledge in linguistics and archeology, but if one rejects physics, the rejection of archeology or linguistics is not much of a leap toward even more ignorance.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon

The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by gluadys, posted 10-01-2008 2:18 AM gluadys has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by IamJoseph, posted 10-01-2008 4:43 AM anglagard has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021