Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,838 Year: 4,095/9,624 Month: 966/974 Week: 293/286 Day: 14/40 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pauls Contradiction?
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4926 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 13 of 31 (264236)
11-29-2005 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by karen
11-22-2005 7:43 PM


apples and oranges
Karen, Paul is not saying a woman can speak in the church. Confusion can set in when we don't pay close attention to the singular and plural in Paul's words. A woman can speak. If she couldn't, she couldn't prophesy.
But "women" plural should not speak among themselves during the service because it's disruptive. It's really not mysogeny as some claim. It's that the men and women sat in different sections, and some women were talking among themselves or asking their husbands in a manner that was disruptive.
Paul probably could have just changed the seating arrangements and had the women sit with their husbands, but they would still need to not be disruptive.
So A WOMAN can speak, teach, preach, whatever to the congregation, but the women as a group should not talk and be disruptive; nor imo, should a woman "teach" her husband in the sense of be his master and he the disciple, if he is not willing. Paul alludes to the law in maintaining a complementarian marital status, but in spiritual affairs maintains equality between the sexes.
This message has been edited by randman, 11-29-2005 05:54 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by karen, posted 11-22-2005 7:43 PM karen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by berberry, posted 11-30-2005 4:00 AM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024