Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 38 (9277 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: GraceAloneSaves
Post Volume: Total: 923,589 Year: 331/3,580 Month: 27/304 Week: 1/26 Day: 0/1 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does the Bible say the Earth was created in 6 days, 6000 years ago?
Percy
Member
Posts: 23636
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 94 of 319 (492423)
12-31-2008 8:43 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by Buzsaw
12-29-2008 5:18 PM


Buzsaw writes:
Rrhain, it's quite impossible to reason with your nonsense. Most of what you concoct up to suit your fancy is not worth the time for response.
Rrhain is just providing the standard creationist literal interpretation of Genesis. If you want to call this literal interpretation nonsense then we agree, but it's creationist nonsense. It's your fellow creationists you have to convince it is nonsense, not us.
Young Earth creationists select one way of literally interpreting Genesis, old Earth creationists another, with the latter being the less literal. Given the freedom creationists grant themselves in interpreting scripture, it can be argued (and is, interminably) that the Bible says any number of things, including that the Earth is 6000 years old on the one hand and billions of years old on the other, and anywhere in between.
What does the Bible actually say about the age of the Earth? Given that it's not a science book: nothing very useful. There are some simple facts, like that the Earth must be at least as old as the people who wrote the Bible, but that's about it.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Buzsaw, posted 12-29-2008 5:18 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Buzsaw, posted 12-31-2008 8:18 PM Percy has not replied

Percy
Member
Posts: 23636
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 95 of 319 (492425)
12-31-2008 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by ICANT
12-29-2008 7:02 PM


Re: Re Sunlight
ICANT writes:
First one would have to believe the creation story given in Genesis 1:2-2:3 is the original creation. Which it isn't.
But Genesis starts with "In the beginning." How is it not about the original creation?
But that is neither here nor there.
My question concerns 65 million years ago...
Let me briefly drop into Admin mode. You're not anywhere remotely close to the topic. Please do not contribute to topic drift.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by ICANT, posted 12-29-2008 7:02 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by jaywill, posted 12-31-2008 10:03 AM Percy has not replied
 Message 98 by ICANT, posted 12-31-2008 12:07 PM Percy has replied
 Message 102 by Buzsaw, posted 12-31-2008 8:33 PM Percy has not replied

Percy
Member
Posts: 23636
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 99 of 319 (492452)
12-31-2008 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by ICANT
12-31-2008 12:07 PM


Re: Re Sunlight
That's one interpretation, but there are many others.
One way of maintaining the illusion of Biblical inerrancy is by interpreting Genesis 1 as describing something other than a six day creation 6000 years ago, which obviously did not happen. If this traditional fundamentalist interpretation is wrong then it isn't science you have to convince. We don't we care, since from a scientific standpoint it's all just religious mythology. It's fundamentalists you have to persuade.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by ICANT, posted 12-31-2008 12:07 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by ICANT, posted 12-31-2008 10:02 PM Percy has not replied
 Message 106 by jaywill, posted 12-31-2008 11:19 PM Percy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2026