Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Was Christ a communist?
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 1 of 128 (389373)
03-13-2007 7:58 AM


That's a nice title, and should set the cat amongst the pigeons!
There's a long history of Christian communism, going back way before the modern secular and often atheistic or anti-theistic communism with which the word is usually associated today. Many have argued that the various forms of Marxism were born out of the Christian ethos.
Here are two obvious examples of the kind of Biblical extracts used by Christian communists to make their point:
Acts 2: 42, 44, and 45:
42 And they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and in fellowship ... 44 And all that believed were together, and had all things in common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
Matthew 19:16-24
16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why do you ask me about what is good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. 18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, 19 Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 20 The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet? 21 Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me. 22 But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions. 23 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
(both King James Version)
You can see the similarity between the first and the basic principle of all communists: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".
I think that Christian communists/socialists can draw very strong arguments from the teachings of Christ.
So the topic for discussion is what the title says:
Was Christ a communist? And I'd like to hear the opinions of both Christians and others on the subject. The implications are that if he was, then all Christians should, of course, be communists.
(Admin. If this passes as a topic, I suppose "social and religious" issues is the obvious place, but which of the sub-sections, I don't know. Biblical studies are involved, of course).

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 10:26 AM bluegenes has replied
 Message 16 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-13-2007 1:19 PM bluegenes has replied
 Message 81 by truthlover, posted 03-15-2007 2:02 PM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 4 of 128 (389390)
03-13-2007 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by macaroniandcheese
03-13-2007 10:26 AM


brennakimi writes:
i don't buy for a second that to be a christian you have to be a communist or live in abject poverty.
Communism isn't about living in abject poverty. It's more about attempting to end it. From each according to his ability to each according to his need is a bit like an extension of what's done in families and small groups of hunter gatherers.
There's a strong tradition of arguing that Christians should be communistic. Take this, for example, from Not Found
Saint Benedict's vision was a monastery with its fields and workshops that was self-contained and self-supporting. A monk was to think nothing as being his own property but all belonged to all. This ideal was a type of Christian communism like the apostles practiced. It was the early Christians in Jerusalem that Benedict cited for his precedent, all shared in the common stock. This same type of communalism still exists among the best Christian groups today. Upon arriving to America at Plymouth, the Pilgrims initiated communism and for seven years there was to have been no private ownership of land, and everyone was to have been fed and clothed from the common stock. It didn't last long.
(My underlining, for those interested in America's Christian communist heritage)
I suppose that the last phrase "It didn't last long" could be taken as meaning that true Christianity never really took off in America.
Edited by bluegenes, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 10:26 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 11:39 AM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 7 of 128 (389397)
03-13-2007 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by macaroniandcheese
03-13-2007 11:39 AM


being self-sufficient is an honorable goal. but you didn't ask if early american christians or benedictine monks had communistic societies, you asked if jesus was a communist. i answered your question.
I took your first post to mean that you thought Christ was not a communist. I suppose you think that someone who believes in share and share alike and clearly implies that a rich person cannot get to heaven is just communistical, but not a communist.
Edited by bluegenes, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 11:39 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 12:17 PM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 11 of 128 (389402)
03-13-2007 12:38 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by macaroniandcheese
03-13-2007 12:17 PM


brennakimi writes:
there's nothing communist about giving away all you own and living off the kindness of others.
I agree. But Christian communists like the Benedictines don't do that. That's more like holy men of the eastern religions.
Christian communists work in their fields and workshops on a from each according to his ability to each according to his needs basis, and communities would expect to produce enough to feed others as well as themselves.
That's communism. Christ and the apostles didn't hang aroumd with begging bowls, surely. They were working men, fishermen and a skilled carpenter, and would share their fish and loaves with others.
Communists of a sort, I suggest!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 12:17 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 1:08 PM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 12 of 128 (389405)
03-13-2007 12:46 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by ringo
03-13-2007 12:35 PM


Ringo writes:
It seems to me that He wasn't saying, "Don't be rich." He was saying, "Don't be too rich."
He was advocating redistribution of wealth, not equality of wealth.
So can I count that as one vote for Jesus not being a puritanical communist, but definitely being a socialist, Ringo?
And if you agree, then surely that means that all Christians, who are supposed to imitate Christ and follow His teachings, should be socialists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by ringo, posted 03-13-2007 12:35 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by ringo, posted 03-13-2007 1:22 PM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 19 of 128 (389416)
03-13-2007 1:31 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by macaroniandcheese
03-13-2007 1:08 PM


brennakimi writes:
but jesus specifically acted outside of any form of government. communism is a government instituted equalization of income.
I'm glad you brought up government. Communists, including Christian communists, tend to believe in the eventual abolition of the state, as explained here from wiki:
Communism, as such, implies not only the abolition of social classes and private property, but the state as well. Christian communists, like all communists, do not wish to abolish the state in the near future; rather, they seek to abate it gradually over a long period of time. Nevertheless, the fact that they do support the eventual dissolution of government has drawn criticism from other Christians who attribute an intrinsic, hierarchical government to the kingdom of God. Most notably, Biblical prophecy in the Book of Isaiah 9:6-7 holds that the Second Coming of Jesus will result in the creation of a government by God on Earth:
6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. 7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this. (King James Version)
One Christian communist reply is that a government by God is fundamentally different from a government by human beings, and that they oppose the latter but not the former. Some Christian communists argue that the Second Coming will render all human politics irrelevant, and therefore their political goals ” including the creation of a communist society and the abolition of government ” only apply to the period of time left before the Second Coming. Others believe that the utopian society established by Jesus after the Second Coming will practice many, but not all, of the features of communism.
Christian communists can also argue that as Christians support laws that back up their faith in many areas (e.g. against murder, because "Thou shalt not kill") they should also support laws related to the redistribution of wealth and ownership of the means of production.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 1:08 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 3:53 PM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 20 of 128 (389418)
03-13-2007 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Hyroglyphx
03-13-2007 1:19 PM


nem jugg writes:
However, since the ideal of communism is a very pure belief, the real question is why no one is able to make it a lasting reality.
Perhaps the Christian communists could argue that no society has ever had enough real Christians in it to make it work, and that large scale Christian communism has never been tried. They could point out that nominal Christians don't follow the teachings of the communist Christ anyway.
Mathew 19:24 writes:
And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
nem writes:
This is a caveat about the superficial love of money and how to avoid its pitfalls.
Are you sure that's not just wishful thinking on your part, Nemesis? That seems to say very clearly that rich men have got about as much chance of getting to heaven as you have of becoming the Queen of England!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-13-2007 1:19 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 21 of 128 (389420)
03-13-2007 2:18 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by ringo
03-13-2007 1:22 PM


Ringo writes:
I hesitate to use the modern terminology. I think Jesus would have agreed with, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." But He would have emphasized that the distribution was up to individual consciences.
I agree about the problems with terminology. Perhaps we could say that Christ preached voluntary communism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by ringo, posted 03-13-2007 1:22 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by ringo, posted 03-13-2007 2:38 PM bluegenes has replied
 Message 26 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 4:04 PM bluegenes has not replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 24 of 128 (389432)
03-13-2007 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by ringo
03-13-2007 2:38 PM


Instead of buying a second pair of shoes, I could give the money to a shoeless man. But how do I know he would spend the money on shoes instead of booze?
I expect that the Christian communists could point out that "to each according to his needs" would mean that the guy would always have shoes, and that comfortable rehab places would be available, but if an alcoholic counted alcohol as a need, he would have enough of that, too. If he were a good Christian alcoholic, he would also feel the responsibility to work to the best of his abilities.
I'm neither a Christian or a communist, but the point of the thread is really whether or not Christ was ( a communist, that is, as I think we can safely describe him as a Christian of sorts - non-denominational, presumably).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by ringo, posted 03-13-2007 2:38 PM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 4:07 PM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 28 of 128 (389446)
03-13-2007 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by macaroniandcheese
03-13-2007 3:53 PM


brennakimi writes:
the simplified explanation that people in this country get about communism is quite flawed.
'first the capitalists are overthrown by a mob and then there is an anarchical system where people just give each other stuff.'
it's crap. capitalism develops into a socialist system of the redistribution of wealth to ensure that everyone gets both what they need and what they deserve.
I agree with the simplified explanation that people get about communism and:
this is an occasion where wiki is really not your best source. i'd suggest a solid comparitive political theory book
I have read some political theory long ago in my youth, but that wiki quote is adequate for these purposes. I'm also European, so I've known quite a few communists in my time!
Christian communists, apparantly, want to evolve the state away. But however they perceive their way forward, you don't agree that Christ was a communist, anyway, so if you're a Christian, what about Christ being described as a socialist in his general ethos? Lots seems to point to that, surely. He doesn't seem to be the type of character who would approve of an economic system that's powered by greed and selfishness, does he?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 3:53 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 4:45 PM bluegenes has not replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 29 of 128 (389447)
03-13-2007 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by macaroniandcheese
03-13-2007 4:07 PM


brennakimi writes:
and yet you keep arguing about christians being communists. that's not a legitimate argument. just because i have a classfull of students who decide to start a genocide after attending my class doesn't mean i'm a genocidaire.
What's not a legitimate argument? I can argue that Christ was a communist in the same way that I can argue that Karl Marx was a communist. I don't have to be a Christian or a communist or a Marxist in order to do so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 4:07 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 4:47 PM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 32 of 128 (389450)
03-13-2007 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by macaroniandcheese
03-13-2007 4:47 PM


They draw their conclusions from the same scriptures as you do, don't they?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 4:47 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 5:04 PM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 34 of 128 (389454)
03-13-2007 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by macaroniandcheese
03-13-2007 5:04 PM


brennakimi writes:
and just because they decide that the scripture tells them that they should be communistic doesn't mean that jesus was a communist. it's not a legitimate argument.
You mean to say that because you decide that Jesus is not a communist on the basis of the scriptures (what else do you have to go on) that you somehow have a legitimate argument, but that if the Christian communists decide that he is a communist on the basis of the same scriptures, their argument is somehow illegitimate?
I fail to follow this line of reasoning.
How can we assume that you know more about his life than they do?
And why do you assume that he would regard being called a communist as something he needed to defend himself against? As someone who defended the poor, even if he didn't agree exactly with the description, surely he wouldn't consider it too far from the truth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 5:04 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 5:32 PM bluegenes has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 36 of 128 (389458)
03-13-2007 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by macaroniandcheese
03-13-2007 5:32 PM


Their argument is legitimate, but mine isn't?
Here's some more communistical scriptures for you:
Acts 4:32-37:
32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. 33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all. 34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. 36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, 37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet. (King James Version)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 5:32 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by ringo, posted 03-13-2007 6:20 PM bluegenes has replied
 Message 38 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-13-2007 6:27 PM bluegenes has not replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2499 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 39 of 128 (389470)
03-13-2007 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by ringo
03-13-2007 6:20 PM


Ringo writes:
I have already suggested that Jesus' instruction to "sell what you have" was not universal. I'll ask again: Who would they sell to?
I see your point. But look at it this way. If Jesus was starting off an egalitarian movement that did not place values on owning property and material posessions, then his initial following can sell to the non-believers, which appears to be what they did do. Your question would only come into play if his movement caught on in a big way. But it didn't, and it was perhaps a false Christianity which took over instead, with the exception of those groups of monks and nuns who opted out of the various socio-economic systems that they lived in, and chose to live communally instead.
Of course, I could well be wrong, but it's hard to see from Christ's teachings that he intended something like an organized church built around the Roman Empire, or Christianity modelled around European fuedalism, or modern Christianity. I think it's arguable that Christianity was co-opted in an un-Christ like direction. Don't you think that's possible?
If so, that doesn't necessarily mean that modern Christians should be forming some kind of Christian communist party, but perhaps they should consider setting up networks of communes on which true followers of Christ could really live in a Christ-like manner. I'm half serious about this. Camels cannot be fitted through the eyes of needles, and capitalism only works if lots of people are struggling to get themselves into a position from which they cannot go to heaven.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by ringo, posted 03-13-2007 6:20 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by ringo, posted 03-13-2007 7:16 PM bluegenes has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024