So a light source and evening and morning for three days without the sun?
I guess you and Young Earth Creationism would agree at least to that extent.
i just read what's on the page. don't blame me if what the bible says doesn't make sense.
The light source most likely came from God himself. Like when God blinded Paul (Saul) with His glory. And when Moses was very bright because he was near the presence of God.
The light of the sun and moon certainly could have been damaged as it is clear from other Scriptures God could do so.
Standing on the surface of a cloud shrouded Venus we might notice the sun light was impaired or damaged. God damaged the sun light over Pharoah and Egypt in Exodus. It is not a stretch that the cosmos were impaired or damaged before the discription of Day 1 through Day 7.
ad-hoc.
god did not DESTROY the sun over egypt. he covered it. god can surely destroy the sun if he so chooses -- but genesis 1 describes the CREATION of the sun.
Umm... he said damaged, not destroy.
yes, it is. the water pre-exists. god creates and but not . however, god does created from .
This is an english speaking forum, not a hebrew one. So could you explain what the stuff means?
but instead, you have ignored the meaning of this verse in favor if fitting together a little over-literal puzzle. you've ignored the context of not only this verse, but the verse in genesis you're mis-applying it to. in the beginning of god creating the heavens and the earth, the earth was unformed and void. in the beginning. not the end. god started with a waste, and made it not a waste. the creation was the process of making it into something that wasn't a waste.
I agree he didn't make a point there.
Read "Time Has an End" by, H. Camping for great evdence that the Bible is true and the word of God. You can read it online at
Time Has An End
™ Version 4.2