In other words, ignore the details and stick to a dogmatic belief in evolution no matter how many opposing evidences you might face. If evolution is stuck on some details then how can you accept the bigger image? Other scientific theories can be demonstrated, experimented and proven. But evolution is more like a belief system rather than a clearly demonstrated and proven fact.
You know, it's easy to pretend you've responded to someone if you ignore the main point and pick one sentence fragment to reply to. Answer this, if you can:
The ToE is a vital, important scientific theory because of the vast number of questions that it can answer. If you choose to reject it because it hasn't yet explained every detail of ever possible question in the field of natural history, you might as well reject every other science as well. That's an impossible standard.
I said that creationism and intelligent design don't explain anything. You replied,
Realy? Creationism is simple: There is intellegent design all over nature and has to be the product of an intellegent creator. But the ToE relies totally on blind and unconcious chances and mechanisms that can only provide and imaginary way of discarding the intellegent design in nature, but it fall far short of replacing intellegent design. And you call it a logical theory!!
That doesn't explain anything. Creationism certainly is simple, but it is devoid of explanatory power. You ask any question about the natural world and the only answer creationism has is, "Goddit." That doesn't explain why marsupials are only found in Australia. That doesn't explain why the panda, which needs an opposible thumb to eat, doesn't have one. That doesn't explain why fossils have been found in the Antarctic, and it certainly doesn't explain why the particular fossils that were found were there.
Before we can rationally discard the ToE, there has to be a better theory to replace it. Please explain to me how a theory that explains nothing is better than a theory that explains a lot.
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
™ Version 4.2
