Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,790 Year: 4,047/9,624 Month: 918/974 Week: 245/286 Day: 6/46 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does microevolution logically include macroevolution?
Annafan
Member (Idle past 4605 days)
Posts: 418
From: Belgium
Joined: 08-08-2005


Message 42 of 195 (238889)
08-31-2005 7:42 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by crashfrog
08-30-2005 11:44 PM


I read an article once where the author explained that "cookbook" is a better analogy for DNA than the often used "blueprint". I guess that is applicable here?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by crashfrog, posted 08-30-2005 11:44 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Annafan
Member (Idle past 4605 days)
Posts: 418
From: Belgium
Joined: 08-08-2005


Message 170 of 195 (247581)
09-30-2005 7:38 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by Springer
09-29-2005 1:45 PM


Re: What evidence do you expect?
You miss my point... Dogs in all their varieties are still dogs. We are not any closer now to something other than a dog than we were 5,000 years ago. Phenotypic differences can actually be produced rather quickly... but there are obvious barriers that cannot be broken.
ToE will gladly agree with you that dogs will always exclusively give birth to dogs. Any offspring of dogs will always remain dogs, unless we as classifiers decide that we don't call them "dogs" any longer.
What's the problem???
(editops... I had to change 'any ancestors' in 'any offspring', obviously )
This message has been edited by Annafan, 01-10-2005 05:12 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Springer, posted 09-29-2005 1:45 PM Springer has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024