quote:
It is also my favorite example, as it shows an entire new family being created, and is thus harder to discount as being an example of macroevolution.
It fits within the scientific definition of macroevolution, no doubt there. However, as I am sure you already figured out, it will never be deemed macroevolution among creationists. This is the beauty, if you will, of creationists never defining what constitutes macroevolution. Instead, they apply it in an ad hoc nature which allows them to deny macroevolution no matter what. You would think that a unicellular organism becoming multicellular would be classified as macroevolution, but I would bet that none of the creationist would agree.